Smart, London, mahogany double fusee 12" drop dial.

Chris Radano

Registered User
Feb 18, 2004
3,867
257
83
Pennsylvania
Country
Region
I've had this clock for about 15 years. It's been a little bit pushed to the side. But I realized I haven't posted it here yet.
To start, I think we're looking at a 1960s restoration job. Whenever this clock was restored, it's been a while given the appearance of the movement.
There are several Smarts, London, listed in Loomes that are possible candidates. But somewhere second quarter of the 19th c. seems right.
There are some crude aspects to the case and movement construction. This maker did not appear to be hell bent on quality. But the clock does have a quaint, if not massive, feel to it. Including some lovely white mold in the case.
There is a nice shaped pendulum, and bottom door lock with key.
The hands that came with the clock look like subpar replacements. They are blued steel, but the hour hand is too loose and unusable in it's current state.
The last photo shows a really nice pair of hands I had made for this clock. This second set of hands is made from relatively thick steel, but it does look like they can be made to work. The bluing is superb.
So another clock I squirreled away. :emoji_chipmunk:

DSCN7366.JPG DSCN7367.JPG DSCN7368.JPG DSCN7369.JPG DSCN7370.JPG DSCN7371.JPG DSCN7372.JPG DSCN7373.JPG DSCN7375.JPG DSCN7376.JPG DSCN7377.JPG DSCN7378.JPG DSCN7379.JPG
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alex K

Chris Radano

Registered User
Feb 18, 2004
3,867
257
83
Pennsylvania
Country
Region
I have always fancied a clock with those hands.
I suppose you are referring to the second set? I agree. Maybe they are not correct but they are lovely.

I like the side ears. They remind me of a woman standing with her hands on her hips, glaring disapprovingly at her husband.
 

novicetimekeeper

Registered User
Jul 26, 2015
10,864
860
113
Dorset
Country
Region
sorry, hadn't picked up about the hands, yes the second set. I have seen them on both brackets and dial clocks but only a couple of times on dial clocks.
 

Chris Radano

Registered User
Feb 18, 2004
3,867
257
83
Pennsylvania
Country
Region
The nicer hands are Regency style. I had these made firstly because I like them. The shaped pendulum rod can be found on Regency, or slightly later, London clocks (mostly bracket clocks but some drop dials). This clock has the correct pendulum, so finding these hands on this this clock is not outlandish. But the clock is pushing the date a bit to the late side for this style of hands. I took some liberty.

Also, I wondered why double fusee dial clocks are found with false plates, and time only usually are not. I think partly so the strike work has room to operate.
 

novicetimekeeper

Registered User
Jul 26, 2015
10,864
860
113
Dorset
Country
Region
False plates were used on some early dial clocks, not just twin fusee. I think convex dial though. My flat dial dwerrihouse is twin fusee and doesn't have one.
 

jmclaugh

Registered User
Jun 1, 2006
5,289
234
63
Devon
Country
Region
A nice drop dial, it looks like rosewood. I can't quite make out the abbreviated first name but it should narrow down which of the Smarts in London it is.
 

Chris Radano

Registered User
Feb 18, 2004
3,867
257
83
Pennsylvania
Country
Region
Yes you are correct, a false plate would have no bearing on the strike work. So then perhaps false plate use for double fusees made it easier to use standard dials. With strike work there are less areas for dial feet holes. False plates give versatility to allow holes in the front plate.
 

Chris Radano

Registered User
Feb 18, 2004
3,867
257
83
Pennsylvania
Country
Region
Oops Jonathan, I forgot the first name is "Wm".
Loomes has a William Smart London simply, "early 19th c." Which does not narrow down the date enough .
Boy, it really has been a while since I looked at this clock :=
Now I like it again, I plan to get it running.
 

Sooth

NAWCC Member
Feb 19, 2005
3,936
67
48
37
Cornwall, Ontario, Canada
www.angelfire.com
Country
Region
Beautiful clock, Chris. I don't know that I've ever noticed an English fusee movement with the barrels poking out the bottom like a little bum, haha. I tend to think most English movements were rather generous when it came to brass or plate sizes. I agree your hands may look much better.
 

Chris Radano

Registered User
Feb 18, 2004
3,867
257
83
Pennsylvania
Country
Region
There are many time only fusee movements from this period that have the spring barrel close to the edge of the plate. This one is a double fusee, two spring barrels are close to the edge. Thank you for the image of a bum, now I see that.
I have another twin fusee wall clock (hmmm, no thread for that one yet). However, the movement on that clock has shaped plates, thicker, and has 5 pillars. It is more finely finished than Wm. Smart.
Looks like Wm. Smart was trying to cut corners, save brass, etc. However, Smart's clock is certainly a substantial and adequate clock. There is plenty of brass, also his movement has a couple nice ornamental features.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
164,879
Messages
1,434,716
Members
85,847
Latest member
Ridanovic
Encyclopedia Pages
1,101
Total wiki contributions
2,872
Last edit
Rockford's early high grade movements by Greg Frauenhoff