Most visitors online was 1660 , on 12 Dec 2020
I like that last one, does that go all the way round the chapter ring?A couple more...
1. Richd Houton Oversly Green 1730
2. Henry Buxton Penn/ Wolverhampton 1730
Again English longcase
View attachment 619983 View attachment 619984
I think that is quite a modern one, perhaps three train?I like the last one too, quite unusual. I assume the date is wrong for # 4 Anon 1900?
Very nice, you also find individual minute numbering on early English longcase and bracket clocks.. View attachment 619947 View attachment 619948 View attachment 619949 View attachment 619950
Early French Pendule religieuse also had half hour markers. They also have the individual minutes numbered.
1. Chauvin 1660's
2. Pierre DeChesne 1680
3. Claude Raillard 1670's
4. Unsigned 1660's
The reason I'm not convinced is floating ones are found on 17th C lantern clocks along of course with fixed ones.Yes floating came later, but it's a timeline for a maker, engraver, region. Not all were at the same place at the same time.
Yes the very earliest English pendulum clock have that. I have seen it on a very few rare German clocks from 16thC and early 17thC.Very nice, you also find individual minute numbering on early English longcase and bracket clocks.
The single train Gould one is unusual as is the position of the calendar.
It appears many of the London makers used similar patterns and quite possibly a small numbers of engravers leading to fairly homogenous designs.I'm thinking that since the dial maker was very often different from the clockmaker, the clockmakers' names are not relevant. What might be relevant are the date of the clock and where it was made. (Similar dates and locales may have similar half-hour markers because they were made by the same dial maker.) Just an opinion.
Frank
Here are two shots of my Thomas Lister of Halifax tall case clock. Lister, Jr. worked alone in Halifax until 1795. He then partnered with Bromley. So this clock was made in or before 1795.
View attachment 620330
View attachment 620331
I know we have had this discussion before about the date or authenticity of my Lister clock. Some said, if I recall correctly, that the Hepplewhite case came later. I'll have to search for that thread.Have you had this chapter ring off yet? I'm still not convinced it is original to the clock, removing it would probably confirm that one way or another
I think the suggestion is it might reveal evidence it has been dancing with more than one dial. Removing a chapter ring isn't straightforward if the dial is attached to the movement and best to be familar with what you are doing especially on such a lovely dial.IWhat would taking off the chapter ring show me? How difficult is that?