Hi! This is a post about me repairing a very cheap chinese watch I bought in 2017. It's a cheap Shanghai A581 remake, for everyday use. I like the vintage looks of it and I think it's a great looking watch, and also… it's very inexpensive. That's my watch here, and here's the review I've wrote back then on WatchUSeek.: Shanghai A581 - a Chinese reissue Like I've wrote on Friday, the watch broke, so I got a chance to open it and see what's inside: The poorly finished movement (not the worst I've seen, but the finish quality is poor) is the standard Chinese caliber made since 1970s. As you can see, the problem is with the ratchet wheel that disengaged the crown wheel: This should not be possible at all, so either the screw was loose or maybe it's because the ratchet wheel has too much play on the barrel arbor. Examining it, yes it does have some play and also it's somewhat thinner than the earlier wheels I have in stock. I was even thinking I could replace the ratchet wheel, but first, I just wanted to make sure it's needed to replace a part, so I reattached the wheel and that's where the real problem started. Usually when I screw down the ratchet wheel, I screw it down till it starts turning, then I wind up the watch and tighten the screw when it's fully wound (so that the ratchet wheel won't turn easily anymore. OK, OK, because of the ratchet wheel problem I did use a tad more force than usual, and so - maybe I did put a tad too much force, but I'd expect the (very thin) screw thread to give in first in such case, while no... The tightening of the screw caused two issues - firstly, I cracked the chrome coating of the screw (yes, the Chinese make chrome plated steel screws, believe it or not...). That's a cosmetic issue, painful, but quite meaningless. The other thing was that oddly, the ratchet wheel advanced a few clicks ahead with an ominous sound coming from inside of the movement. I was sure I damaged (stretched?) the mainspring, and the fact that the watch would not work anymore kind of confirmed it. So I took the barrel apart, removed the mainspring (which looked good), relubricated the (DRY as Sahara sands!) barrel and used a different mainspring to make sure. However, the watch still would not run a bit. So I put the original mainspring back in the barrel, and disassembled the whole movement to see what's wrong. I just could not believe my eyes: The center wheel lost a great deal of teeth (wheel on the left, on it's right, it's not a light glare, there are not teeth there )! [EDIT] better pic for you: I broke the center wheel with my screwdriver, by tightening the ratchet wheel screw. It's just hard to believe, I'd not even think it's possible. OK, maybe in a very, very small ladies' watch, but then again - I'd still expect the screw thread to beak first, not the center wheel! I had an old Chinese movement in my drawer, so I took a replacement wheel from there. It's in near perfect condition, so I could use it to repair my watch. I assembled the watch, but it would not run with the new wheel. WHY It seemed like now the center wheel would rub against the pallet fork, locking the movement. I examined the wheel to check if it's all nicely flat (which it was), compared the sideshake and the endshake with the original wheel, compared the wheels - without any precision measurements, they looked the same, so probably there was just a micrometric difference between the two. Finally I took the donor movement's pallet fork to compare, and again - it was all the same (but then again - I used just a magnifying glass to tell). Actually I even intended to try the other fork for my watch, but the new one was al nice and shiny, while the old one... you know So I assembled just the center wheel and the fork and I found the problem. On the new fork, there was a thick, somewhat excessive, blob of shellac on the exit pallet. I used a heated screwdriver to flatten the blob and reassembled the movement again (photo showing the blob before I flattened it): The movement is of very simple design, actually very similar to most of the movements of this type (direct drive sweep second). There is a separate bridge for the center wheel, then there are the 3rd gear and the 4th that's co-axial with the center, and then the escape wheel. After reassembling (damn it, another screwdriver slip, but the notch in this screw is very shallow), the watch started running and it still after over an hour, so I think it should be fine now. Conclusions? Pay attention to details and don't tighten screws too much. I keep saying it and yet I sometimes tighten them myself It's funny, the 'natural' urge to try to tighten a screw in such cases. It won't help, but one still gives it a try . And just a slight Off-Top to end my post - here's my new toy : I have not had one for like 15 years now. My dad took all the vinyl plates with him, so I now have to get my own collection, but it's soo good to hear the pure, analog sound again
I’m thinking you did not do that damage when you tightened the arbor screw. The damage was done when the ratchet wheel lifted and disengaged from the click, thereby suddenly releasing all the power of the mspg. To properly tighten the barrel arbor screw I block the click with a screwdriver so the wheel cannot turn. Then if you choose you can tighten enough to snap off the head of the screw. Really tho, you don’t want to tighten that much but the way you did it you could break the mpg. Peter
I'm nit going to try again, but the wheel is thin and I'm quite convinced I really did it with my screwdriver. Maybe one day I'll find a dead 'Chinese standard' and check
A "Denon" turn table. A very nice one. That brand was quite popular during the Golden era of stereo systems.
Yes, a very nice turntable indeed. Good quality and fully automatic (which you might like or not). Of course, the cartridge can be replaced with a better one. The only thing is that it's not idiotproof, and when I once pressed start again instead of stop, it sent the arm far to the label (not lifting it!!!), and since the buttons are next to each other - beware!!! But enough with the off-top. Back to my Shanghai - after the repairs it started loosing over a minute a day, and I wonder if I accidentally moved the regulator or if my work really did alter the rate so badly I think it might be a good idea to fully service it now...
Today I finally tried to do something with my locking click... As you see - the click locks and the watch won’t wind. I don’t know why, it looks fine. The watch works fine and suddenly it locks and you have to unlock it manually. Then it works for some time and locks again. It’s the third time now. I replaced it with another click and we’ll see. I have to admit, I thought cheap Russian movements were bad, but they are great compared to this crap... Surely the Chinese can give the word ‚crap’ a whole new meaning Funny thing - I do like this watch, that’s why I care. I should have thrown that away a long time ago, but I like it
It worked for a day. The winding disintegrated again and mainspring broke. I think I’ve had enough of this watch now
With the remarkable set of tools (I’m not at home)... ...I made my way to the mainspring. It’s not broken, only bent due to the winding gear malfunction. I put that back together and it works, but with this winding mechanism, it won’t work any long...
Ok - I got back home and disassmebled the watch again. To fix the winding issues for good (I hope)... The good thing about these (and similar) movements is that you don’t have to even remove it from the case. It is easier to do it in setting position. I noticed that the clutch gear has a damaged tooth, likely responsible for the winding problems (poorly engaging the winding pinion). I left the stem in płace in the parts’ mvt - I’m rarely so wise, so that’s lucky! Initial winding went smoothly, so I’m hoping for the best. Maybe if the winding stops disengaging all the time, the ratchet wheel won’t unscrew itself any more. If not - I’ll have to look for a new barrel arbor...
Ok, so far so good - winds up all right. The winding is very stiff, but I heard that's typical for this caliber - stiff winding due to the gear ratios. I hope this ends the trouble with this watch, but... so I have already hoped before
Finally I got to the reason the click keeps locking (locked again, yes). It is not the click, it is the winding gear. Not very clear here, the gear has a short tooth. This particular tooth fails to give the click the initial push (does not reach it) and so the other teeth won’t engage the click. That’s why it locks randomly and rarely - the winding has to end with this particular tooth being the one initiating the click’s action. I have a replacement gear, but of different finish and thicker. For now it will have to do... Hey, I’m still thinking of throwing this thing to the trash bin, where it belongs
I know this thread is a bit old, but my only comment is that a Shanghai watch shouldn't have a ZLN (Liaoning) movement in it, so the movement itself may have been a piece-together of cobbled parts. It was almost certainly a replacement, at best. A Shanghai tongji/standard would normally be ZSH 7120 or SS7, or (sometimes) the re-issues I've seen that are legitimately made by Shanghai (which, these days is normally from a few companies/makers licenced by Shanghai to use the branding) would use a Shanghai B/8120. I've met a few of these Shanghai licencees on their home turf and the use of a ZLN tongji would surprise me. Shanghai 7120s and 8120s in good shape are not in short supply, and Perrinwatch or Esslinger 2650 are just skeletonized Tongji. So I'd expect them to fit, too,which might be a better solution. As you noted elsewhere, the dial and case are quite nice.
Interesting - the watch was purchased as „brand new”... so that’s suprising... The watch works fine now, so I’ll just leave it be. But getting a brand new watch with a replaced movement? That’s ‚Special’
My thinking is that Jun at Goodstuffs purchased it as a new item from his supplier, and sold it that way. Sometimes supply chains in China can be...murky. I know some products Jun has come from odd suppliers (for example, he has HKED logo 1963 chronographs that HKED finds troublesome) but it's not clear where that problem rests because Jun has a good reputation for customer support and lots of satisfied customers. That said, HKED has mentioned online that he is trying to sort that out because Ed designed the non-star 1963s--no one had them before Ed, and I know the background of Ed's watches *very* well. Ah well, onward.
Chinese sellers have poor standards, I think. I bought my BeiHai anniversary watch there as well and... not like I don't like it, or anything like that - I adore it, but a brand new watch should not have a deep scratch on the back (clearly opened or the factory needs a new worker ). Anyway - Chinese might make good watches, but the assembling quality and customer service still needs some work...
I know some very good Chinese suppliers, with very good customer support, and a number of very reputable watch making companies, so I don't generalize about poor standards that broadly. I also have a Beijing Beihai 50th LE, provided to me by the General Manager of BJWAF at the time, Mr. Miao Hong Bo, who arranged one of the last available ones for me, for pickup at Beijing's flagship store at the Malls at Oriental Plaza in Beijing, after we discussed it at the 2014 China Watch and Clock Fair in Shenzhen, and a close contact of Mr. Miao put in a good word for me. My 2014 China trip watch purchases. (Update: question answered) The SB18-3 in mine is a thing of beauty, and mine had no scratches. I'd have been upset with that, too, but I've never had that problem when purchasing from any direct Beijing outlet, online or in the store. A commenter in that thread stated that his was 4th last at the Beijing store, and I was informed mine was 3rd last in the country. That commenter stated that he thought more would be made, but I don't know of any made since then, and they were a numbered series. All the newer Beihai are different in some way, and there have been a few iterations. It was a popular model, and I know Beijing probably could have made more, but the next version, which came out very soon after, had a date window.
Yes - obviously generalizing will always hurt someone, obviously there are better and worse suppliers. Also - I'm not saying mine is exactly bad, I think at least some of them just don't see anything wrong in sending a new watch with obviously scratched back. I guess the watch had been adjusted/repaired - maybe a returned and repaired item, who knows I don't have pics at hand, but it's a deep, nasty cut, not some micro-scratches. Obviously watches are still - at least in part - assembled by human beings and some traces of that can be found - my Vostok Classica has some short (factory made) scratches on the underside of the lugs when fitting the strap. But that's not any bad at all, this cut is nasty, and even 'nastier' in a more expensive, limited edition watch Interesting thing - it seems some BeiHai (even among the limited only) watches have 4-armed balance, while some (incl mine) have 3-armed balance. Strange...
That is interesting, and I have no answer. I hope to be in Beijing later in the year (uncertain right now, plainly) . and I may be able to ask on Wechat.
