etmb61
NAWCC Member
Re: My latestaddition: JUF
John,
I don't think that's a Kienzle 33 pendulum at all.
Eric
John,
I don't think that's a Kienzle 33 pendulum at all.
Eric
Anetta, you also have a Schlenker & Posner with Plate 1529A, the same movement as found with the Patch's clock. Yours was made in 1932 based on the serial number 22321; it also has the original SuP 4-Ball pendulum No. 37. I mentioned earlier that many of these Louvre (bandstand) clocks had the pendulum balls lacquered in the same color as the dial and fittings for the pillars, yours is a perfect example of what I was trying to describe.Hi.
Is it JUF ?
It looks quite similar to the Patch's clock.
Anetta
Patch, good to see you have a correct suspension guard to put on your clock. Regarding the finial you mention, there is not supposed to be a finial above the dial on these clocks(?), have a look at Anetta's clock and you can see the only finials present are above each of the pillars.I do have a suspension tube like the one that is missing. (I almost sold it...)
The center finial above the dial, is missing. Sadly.
My question on the finial. Would it be the same size as the other finials? I may have one turned. Any more information/pictures on the finial, would be appreciated.
Eric, you are correct. I've dug into my photo archives and actual clocks, and this pendulum "looks like" pendulum No. 33 but in fact is a pendulum No. 37 that has had the center finial replaced with a twist rod that looks very similar to the Kienzle No. 33. Here are side-by-side photos showing the differences:John,
I don't think that's a Kienzle 33 pendulum at all.
Eric
Burkhard, thanks for posting. I presume this is the one that presently has a Kundo base that you will be swapping with the other marriage SuP base having a Kundo movement. Based on the serial number this clock was made about mid-1933.Bought a SuP as a restauration projekt.Ser.No. 25662. Mvmt,dial,hands and pendulum are original,the base is not,it has a pendulum guide cup,useless with this short central pendulum rod.I allways liked these translucent enamel dials over the engine turned silvered dial plate.The original laquer seemed to be orange,it is craqueled and comming off,but under the chapter ring is the original color: a deep candy red,which I´m going to recreate.Here are the first pics.
Burkhard
Kamil, thanks for posting your SuP. Based on the serial number it was made about the July-September quarter of 1931. The most unusual feature is the tortoise shell finished dial with a floral lattice design in the center. Is it faux (celluloid) or real tortoise shell?Here is one of my Posners - serial number 18675 :
Burkhard, you now have all the right stuff together and I am confident it will be a "like new" and stunning complete SuP when you are finished. Be sure to post photos!So John,You would agree that this is the correct combination of base,collums,mvmnt. support plate and mvmt? This mvmt. (SuP) obviously has had a hard life before,both the excentric and the pallets have been played with,the bracket was broke and soft soldered and the anchor pin was broke and soft soldered into a slot cut into the anchor,and some ew-teeth were bent and scratched as I've never seen before.I left the soldering as it was,maybe I find a movmt. one day to canibalize parts from and stretched and correctly bent the ew-teeth according to the advice given in the book.Clock is running now for more than 4 days.Now I´m waiting for a free weekend to do the laquering job with my pall
I´ll let You know the results!
Burkhard
Kamil, the only two "plastics" available in the years up to about 1935 were celluloid and Bakelite. Celluloid was in commercial use from the 1870's and Bakelite from 1910.John I think its a celluloid dial or even a plastic one (as its very thinn) - did they made plastic dials around 1930?
PLEASE NOTE THE CORRECTIONS MADE TO SUSPENSION SPRING STRENGTH.John or anyone else:can You tell me what plate that is resp. what SS this takes?TIA
Burkhard
Pl._1317___0.0035"__0.089mm_CORRECT |
Pl._1472H__0.0032"__0.081mm_should_be_0.0035" |
Pl._1490___0.0035"__0.089mm_CORRECT |
Pl._1505___0.0040"__0.102mm_should_be_0.0035" |
Pl._1529___0.0032"__0.081mm_should_be_0.0035" |
Pl._1559___0.0032"__0.081mm_should_be_0.0035" |
With the lighter weight pendulum you should use the 0.081 mm spring. I would be interested to compare what is inside the balls of your pendulum with what Ive found in the "normal" SuP pendulum. If you have another SuP that weighs about what I have reported, you can take the two apart and show us what you find. I'll do the same for comparing the ball weights for a SuP and Kundo pendulum and show that here as well.John,I weighted my SuP pendulum today with an electronic kitchen scale,and it read: 223gramms.It is the verry pendulum depicted above,with chromed ball shells and plain brass structure.So perhaps I should take the weaker 0.081mm SS?What do You think?
Burkhard
I think that the .0035" suspension spring is recommended for this clock. Is there a suspension unit diagram in the repair guide that should be followed for spacing of the blocks and fork?
Pat, thanks for posting the photos of your "new" Schlenker & Posner clock and your questions about it. As already noted, there are no Schlenker & Posner (SuP) back plates identified as such in the Repair Guide, not even the one that is stamped with their logo (Plate 1472H) or their name (Plate 1505). In fact there are six plates in the RG that were made by SuP, as follows:This one was received today from an online auction site. The serial number is 5862. The suspension spring was shown in the auction site pictures, but wasn't with the clock when it was received, except that the bottom block was found in the shipping box.
I think that the .0035" suspension spring is recommended for this clock. Is there a suspension unit diagram in the repair guide that should be followed for spacing of the blocks and fork?
Thanks for any advice on this.
Your copy of Terwilliger is the latest edition but was printed in 1991. A lot more information has come to light since/ SUP were only identified as a maker a few years ago. Until then it was assumed they were KundoMaybe my edition of Terwilliger is not the latest (10th) but in my copy plate # 1490 (Royal Clock Co.) is attributed to Kieninger & Obergfell, not Schlenker & Posner.
JTD
Hi Les,
That looks very similar apart from the two screws for the guard, could it be that as the clock I have is a much lower serial number that the guard was a later addition?
any idea approximately how old my clock could be?
Steve
Your copy of Terwilliger is the latest edition but was printed in 1991. A lot more information has come to light since/ SUP were only identified as a maker a few years ago. Until then it was assumed they were Kundo
Hi all,
I have almost finished restoring this Schlenker & Posner clock but have been unable to find the correct pendulum for it, I think it needs a no.37 like this.
![]()
I have decided to give the clock to a friend for Christmas and have a pendulum that runs the correct time but would prefer if it had the right one.
Do any of you know of somewhere in the UK I might find one? or have a spare they would be willing to swap for a spare Badische 5 ball
pendulum like this that I picked up to try
![]()
any help finding the correct pendulum would be great
Thanks Steve
I think I might have one. It'll be ~7 hours till I'm off work and can check.Hi all,
I have almost finished restoring this Schlenker & Posner clock but have been unable to find the correct pendulum for it, I think it needs a no.37 like this.
![]()
I have decided to give the clock to a friend for Christmas and have a pendulum that runs the correct time but would prefer if it had the right one.
Do any of you know of somewhere in the UK I might find one? or have a spare they would be willing to swap for a spare Badische 5 ball
pendulum like this that I picked up to try
![]()
any help finding the correct pendulum would be great
Thanks Steve