Post Your Schlenker & Posner 400-Day Clocks Here

etmb61

NAWCC Member
Oct 25, 2010
3,302
500
113
Mascoutah, IL
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: JUF

John,

I don't think that's a Kienzle 33 pendulum at all.

Eric
 

Patch

Registered User
May 11, 2010
444
1
0
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: JUF

Thanks for clearing up my, 'foggy brain syndrome' on the identification of this clock. It won't be the last time. This, I'm sure of.

As for the base: When I received the clock, I saw that the bottom base ring, is loaded with stress cracks. Inside the ring, had been repaired, with a lot of solder. (Earlier on this forum, I posted about repairing a crack, at the very bottom of the, "pediment?" (This was where I took small strips of sheet brass, and formed them, 'to fit' the inside of the base. Then used PC-11 to attach them.) In other words, I made a partial base inside the base.
Back to the main topic: I'm not going to clean the base any further. The base cracks, are too noticeable. At the very most, I may brighten it up a little.
I do have a suspension tube like the one that is missing. (I almost sold it...)
The center finial above the dial, is missing. Sadly.
My question on the finial. Would it be the same size as the other finials? I may have one turned. Any more information/pictures on the finial, would be appreciated.
Sorry for my screw-up.
And, Thanks Again!

The other thing that I need to get? A dome. (Ugh! It'll cost more than the clock...)
 
Last edited:

Anetta

Registered User
Dec 3, 2009
59
0
6
Country
Re: My latestaddition: JUF

DSC03644.JPG DSC03647.JPG DSC03648.JPG DSC03649.JPG DSC03650.JPG DSC03652.JPG DSC03653.JPG DSC03654.JPG DSC03656.JPG DSC03657.JPG

Hi.
Is it JUF ?
It looks quite similar to the Patch's clock.

Anetta
 

John Hubby

Senior Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
NAWCC Star Fellow
NAWCC Life Member
Sep 7, 2000
12,296
282
83
The Woodlands, TX
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: JUF

Hi.
Is it JUF ?
It looks quite similar to the Patch's clock.

Anetta
Anetta, you also have a Schlenker & Posner with Plate 1529A, the same movement as found with the Patch's clock. Yours was made in 1932 based on the serial number 22321; it also has the original SuP 4-Ball pendulum No. 37. I mentioned earlier that many of these Louvre (bandstand) clocks had the pendulum balls lacquered in the same color as the dial and fittings for the pillars, yours is a perfect example of what I was trying to describe.
 

John Hubby

Senior Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
NAWCC Star Fellow
NAWCC Life Member
Sep 7, 2000
12,296
282
83
The Woodlands, TX
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: JUF

I do have a suspension tube like the one that is missing. (I almost sold it...)
The center finial above the dial, is missing. Sadly.
My question on the finial. Would it be the same size as the other finials? I may have one turned. Any more information/pictures on the finial, would be appreciated.
Patch, good to see you have a correct suspension guard to put on your clock. Regarding the finial you mention, there is not supposed to be a finial above the dial on these clocks(?), have a look at Anetta's clock and you can see the only finials present are above each of the pillars.

Regarding a dome, try MileHi Clock supplies at www.milehiclocksupplies.com, in stock and lowest price I know of.
 

Kevin W.

NAWCC Member
Apr 11, 2002
23,709
767
113
65
Nepean, Ontario, Canada
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: JUF

Nice one Patch, i really like these as well. Sure is pretty.
I would be very excited to have one too.
 

Patch

Registered User
May 11, 2010
444
1
0
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: JUF

Thanks, Kevin. I waited awhile, for this one to come along. It was worth the wait.
 

Anetta

Registered User
Dec 3, 2009
59
0
6
Country
Re: My latestaddition: JUF

Thank you two Patch and John for help. Is so good to know a lot more about those fabulous clocks :excited:

Kind Regards

Anetta
 

John Hubby

Senior Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
NAWCC Star Fellow
NAWCC Life Member
Sep 7, 2000
12,296
282
83
The Woodlands, TX
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

John,

I don't think that's a Kienzle 33 pendulum at all.

Eric
Eric, you are correct. I've dug into my photo archives and actual clocks, and this pendulum "looks like" pendulum No. 33 but in fact is a pendulum No. 37 that has had the center finial replaced with a twist rod that looks very similar to the Kienzle No. 33. Here are side-by-side photos showing the differences:

159533 P33.jpg 156408 P33 Side.jpg 38955 Pend 33.jpg 28073 No. 37 Pend.jpg 25152 P37 Top.jpg

First photo is a Kienzle No. 33, note the R-A F-S markings on the rating nut. This configuration continued unchanged with both Kern & Link and then Kern & Söhne.

Second photo is also a Kienzle No. 33, note that the twist rod bottom extension is flush with the bottom of the pendulum ball arm cross support and that the pear-shape bottom ball has a noticeable rim around its center. Also note that the rating nut edge has vertical ribbing.

Third photo is a SuP "faux 33". Note that the twist rod bottom extension is "not" flush with the bottom of the pendulum ball arm cross support but there is a collar about 5-6 mm long between the twist rod and the cross support. Thus it is shorter than the twist rod extension of the Kienzle No. 33. Also note the pear-shape ball is similar to the real No. 33 and does have a rim but less accentuated, and that the edge of the rating nut is distinctly knurled, not ribbed.

Fourth photo is a SuP No. 37 (misidentified in the Repair Guide as a Kundo). Note the bottom finial has the same collar between it and the bottom of the pendulum ball arm cross support as does the SuP "faux 33", and that the rating nut has identical knurling.

Fifth photo is a SuP No. 37 top view of the rating nut. Note this is the identical pattern as seen on the "faux 33" from Patch's clock, and is found on all No. 37 and the newly uncovered "faux 33" found only on SuP clocks.

So, thanks to Eric's keen eye what we have here is a variant of the SuP No. 37 pendulum, with the twist rod extension simply replacing the usual No. 37 finial. For database purposes I have labeled this one as pendulum No. 37A, the only difference being the twist rod in place of the usual finial.

EDIT: Now that we have this one identified, I'm moving the thread to the "Post Your Schlenker & Posner 400-Day Clocks Here" thread for archival and continued discussion.

159533 P33.jpg 156408 P33 Side.jpg 38955 Pend 33.jpg 28073 No. 37 Pend.jpg 25152 P37 Top.jpg
 
Last edited:

Patch

Registered User
May 11, 2010
444
1
0
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

Proper ID. Proper suspension. Proper pendulum. Back to the tedium of, "regulation." Thanks, to one and all!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Burkhard Rasch

NAWCC Member
Jun 1, 2007
5,227
412
83
67
Twistringen
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

Bought a SuP as a restauration projekt.Ser.No. 25662. Mvmt,dial,hands and pendulum are original,the base is not,it has a pendulum guide cup,useless with this short central pendulum rod.I allways liked these translucent enamel dials over the engine turned silvered dial plate.The original laquer seemed to be orange,it is craqueled and comming off,but under the chapter ring is the original color: a deep candy red,which I´m going to recreate.Here are the first pics.
Burkhard
 

Attachments

  • SuP 007.JPG
    SuP 007.JPG
    62.6 KB · Views: 72
  • SuP 004.JPG
    SuP 004.JPG
    46.1 KB · Views: 93
  • SuP 005.JPG
    SuP 005.JPG
    51.3 KB · Views: 105
  • SuP 009.JPG
    SuP 009.JPG
    58.8 KB · Views: 67

John Hubby

Senior Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
NAWCC Star Fellow
NAWCC Life Member
Sep 7, 2000
12,296
282
83
The Woodlands, TX
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

Bought a SuP as a restauration projekt.Ser.No. 25662. Mvmt,dial,hands and pendulum are original,the base is not,it has a pendulum guide cup,useless with this short central pendulum rod.I allways liked these translucent enamel dials over the engine turned silvered dial plate.The original laquer seemed to be orange,it is craqueled and comming off,but under the chapter ring is the original color: a deep candy red,which I´m going to recreate.Here are the first pics.
Burkhard
Burkhard, thanks for posting. I presume this is the one that presently has a Kundo base that you will be swapping with the other marriage SuP base having a Kundo movement. Based on the serial number this clock was made about mid-1933.

After you get everything together post some photos of the completed "divorce and remarriage" :D
 

John Hubby

Senior Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
NAWCC Star Fellow
NAWCC Life Member
Sep 7, 2000
12,296
282
83
The Woodlands, TX
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

Here is one of my Posners - serial number 18675 :
Kamil, thanks for posting your SuP. Based on the serial number it was made about the July-September quarter of 1931. The most unusual feature is the tortoise shell finished dial with a floral lattice design in the center. Is it faux (celluloid) or real tortoise shell?

I have documented one other SuP with the identical dial but did not obtain info about what the dial was made of. Here are two photos:

23788 Dial.JPG 23788 Pend-Base.JPG This clock is identical to yours except for the base which was one I have not seen before, with multiple convex ribs around the circumference. I notice the center design of the dial for this clock is "brighter" than yours but don't know what if anything was done to bring out the colors. Does the design on yours appear to have any gold lacquer or some other kind of opaque finish? I would use Rub'nBuff to bring out the design if it were my clock.
 

Burkhard Rasch

NAWCC Member
Jun 1, 2007
5,227
412
83
67
Twistringen
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

So John,You would agree that this is the correct combination of base,collums,mvmnt. support plate and mvmt? This mvmt. (SuP) obviously has had a hard life before,both the excentric and the pallets have been played with,the bracket was broke and soft soldered and the anchor pin was broke and soft soldered into a slot cut into the anchor,and some ew-teeth were bent and scratched as I've never seen before.I left the soldering as it was,maybe I find a movmt. one day to canibalize parts from and stretched and correctly bent the ew-teeth according to the advice given in the book.Clock is running now for more than 4 days.Now I´m waiting for a free weekend to do the laquering job with my pall
I´ll let You know the results!
Burkhard

SuP+KundO swap 008.JPG SuP+KundO swap 011.JPG SuP+KundO swap 012.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Kamil Urbanowicz

Registered User
Aug 17, 2010
283
16
18
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

John I think its a celluloid dial or even a plastic one (as its very thinn) - did they made plastic dials around 1930?
 

John Hubby

Senior Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
NAWCC Star Fellow
NAWCC Life Member
Sep 7, 2000
12,296
282
83
The Woodlands, TX
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

So John,You would agree that this is the correct combination of base,collums,mvmnt. support plate and mvmt? This mvmt. (SuP) obviously has had a hard life before,both the excentric and the pallets have been played with,the bracket was broke and soft soldered and the anchor pin was broke and soft soldered into a slot cut into the anchor,and some ew-teeth were bent and scratched as I've never seen before.I left the soldering as it was,maybe I find a movmt. one day to canibalize parts from and stretched and correctly bent the ew-teeth according to the advice given in the book.Clock is running now for more than 4 days.Now I´m waiting for a free weekend to do the laquering job with my pall
I´ll let You know the results!
Burkhard
Burkhard, you now have all the right stuff together and I am confident it will be a "like new" and stunning complete SuP when you are finished. Be sure to post photos!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

John Hubby

Senior Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
NAWCC Star Fellow
NAWCC Life Member
Sep 7, 2000
12,296
282
83
The Woodlands, TX
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

John I think its a celluloid dial or even a plastic one (as its very thinn) - did they made plastic dials around 1930?
Kamil, the only two "plastics" available in the years up to about 1935 were celluloid and Bakelite. Celluloid was in commercial use from the 1870's and Bakelite from 1910.

Celluloid for clock dials came into use about 1890 and continued up to WWII. After that war it was replaced by other plastic materials such as polystyrene, acrylics, and acetal polymers. Celluloid was also used for complete clock cases, especially 30-hour novelty, boudoir, and alarm clocks starting in the early 1900's. These have been documented as matching pieces to ladies' dressing table sets among other uses, made from the early 1900's and in particular in the 1920's-1930's.

Bakelite was used extensively for clock case parts starting in the early 1920's and continuing well after WWII, for example as the support under thin spun brass bases. It was used for complete clock cases as well especially for electric clocks, and for some dials especially Art Deco designs with vivid colors. However, it was difficult to make thin sheets of Bakelite so I would venture that the dial on your clock and the other example I posted were most likely made of celluloid. The complete sets I mentioned above made of celluloid include many examples of faux tortoise shell objects, which would also support the material used for these dials.
 

Burkhard Rasch

NAWCC Member
Jun 1, 2007
5,227
412
83
67
Twistringen
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

John or anyone else:can You tell me what plate that is resp. what SS this takes?TIA
Burkhard
 

Attachments

  • SuP 009.JPG
    SuP 009.JPG
    51.4 KB · Views: 82
  • SuP 010.JPG
    SuP 010.JPG
    51.6 KB · Views: 95
  • SuP 002.JPG
    SuP 002.JPG
    55.5 KB · Views: 89
  • SuP 005.JPG
    SuP 005.JPG
    41.4 KB · Views: 88

etmb61

NAWCC Member
Oct 25, 2010
3,302
500
113
Mascoutah, IL
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

Burkhard,

There is no exact plate match for this in the guide, but plate 1505 is close. I think John has posted a list of the SuP plates in this thread. The bad news is because they were all misidentified, they each call for different suspension springs.

Eric
 

Tinker Dwight

Registered User
Oct 11, 2010
13,664
93
0
Calif. USA
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

If you have a spring of known size, it might be
easiest to mount it and determine the desired
rate from there.
Tinker Dwight
 

John Hubby

Senior Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
NAWCC Star Fellow
NAWCC Life Member
Sep 7, 2000
12,296
282
83
The Woodlands, TX
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

John or anyone else:can You tell me what plate that is resp. what SS this takes?TIA
Burkhard
PLEASE NOTE THE CORRECTIONS MADE TO SUSPENSION SPRING STRENGTH.

Burkhard, I've identified this plate as Plate 1529A, being identical to Plate 1529 but with no logo present. This is the most frequently found plate for all SuP clocks documented to date.

For the suspension spring, the correct spring is 0.0035" (0.089mm) for all SuP clocks. The SuP standard pendulum No. 37 is NOT the same weight as the early Kundo pendulums on which Terwilliger based his spring size determinations. I have just weighed a half dozen of each and the SuP pendulum weighs an average of 9.75 ounces (277 gm) and the Kundo pre-WWII pendulums (No. 35, No. 41, No. 97) all weigh an average of 8.33 ounces (236 gm). The heavier SuP pendulum thus requires a stronger suspension spring to obtain the correct rate of 8 beats per minute.

Of the six SuP plates that are incorrectly identified in the Repair Guide, four have incorrect suspension spring strengths:

Pl._1317___0.0035"__0.089mm_CORRECT
Pl._1472H__0.0032"__0.081mm_should_be_0.0035"
Pl._1490___0.0035"__0.089mm_CORRECT
Pl._1505___0.0040"__0.102mm_should_be_0.0035"
Pl._1529___0.0032"__0.081mm_should_be_0.0035"
Pl._1559___0.0032"__0.081mm_should_be_0.0035"



The two that show a 0.0035" (0.089mm) spring must have been measured with pendulum No. 37 as that shows the correct spring strength. Except for Plate 1505 which is identified as a JUF and was most likely measured with a JUF 4-Ball pendulum weighing 12.5 ounces (355 gm), the others must have been tested with a Kundo pendulum such as No. 35 weighing 8.33 ounces (236 gm).

In addition to this problem there are multiple errors and omissions in the drawings for these plates that certainly don't make it any easier to use the RG as a reference. There are also some logos documented that don't appear in the book, including J. L. Hudson and Delta. The word "Germany" is missing on some two plate versions.

At some point soon I need to revamp what has been developed to date regarding SuP plate designations. In fact there are only two plate designs, the earliest with no suspension guard like Plate 1317 and then later with a tubular guard as shown for Plate 1559. The only other variations are the names and logos stamped on these two basic plates. Some confusion is tossed into the equation when we find the same name or logo on both plate versions, but that is no different than what is found in Kundo and other maker's clocks before and after they added suspension guards.

My apologies for the confusion, that's what happens when one makes assumptions. :bang:
 
Last edited:

Burkhard Rasch

NAWCC Member
Jun 1, 2007
5,227
412
83
67
Twistringen
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

John,I weighted my SuP pendulum today with an electronic kitchen scale,and it read: 223gramms.It is the verry pendulum depicted above,with chromed ball shells and plain brass structure.So perhaps I should take the weaker 0.081mm SS?What do You think?
Burkhard
 

John Hubby

Senior Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
NAWCC Star Fellow
NAWCC Life Member
Sep 7, 2000
12,296
282
83
The Woodlands, TX
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

John,I weighted my SuP pendulum today with an electronic kitchen scale,and it read: 223gramms.It is the verry pendulum depicted above,with chromed ball shells and plain brass structure.So perhaps I should take the weaker 0.081mm SS?What do You think?
Burkhard
With the lighter weight pendulum you should use the 0.081 mm spring. I would be interested to compare what is inside the balls of your pendulum with what Ive found in the "normal" SuP pendulum. If you have another SuP that weighs about what I have reported, you can take the two apart and show us what you find. I'll do the same for comparing the ball weights for a SuP and Kundo pendulum and show that here as well.
 

Burkhard Rasch

NAWCC Member
Jun 1, 2007
5,227
412
83
67
Twistringen
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

the balls in my SuP pendulum are steel,not lead,verry professionaly made,so I tend to believe they´re original,not homemade.They fit exactly into the shells.
BTW do You know wether the escape wheels of SuP and KundO are interchangable? Reason I ask is :the ew. in my SuP is shot,bejond repair,and the distance between the plates are identical in both clocks.TIA
Burkhard
 

Burkhard Rasch

NAWCC Member
Jun 1, 2007
5,227
412
83
67
Twistringen
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

SuP updated:since we had bad weather yesterday we did the laquering finaly.And the result is here.Now it needs "just" a new escapement wheel and -if possible- a new anchor-to run.The pictures don't reproduce the color exactly,we chose a deep candy red which came out brilliantly on the dial while the colums and balls have a verry slight purple tone.Anyway I like it.
Burkhard

SuP laquering 001.JPG SuP laquering 002.JPG SuP laquering 003.JPG SuP laquering 005.JPG SuP laquering 008.JPG SuP laquering 015.JPG SuP laquering 011.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Burkhard Rasch

NAWCC Member
Jun 1, 2007
5,227
412
83
67
Twistringen
Country
Region
Re: My latestaddition: SuP

it needed indeed a full afternoon:swapped the ew. with one from a KundO standard with no problem,they´re absolutely interchangable.Not so the anchor:pivots of SuP are much thinner than KundO,so it retained the old butchered anchor with soft solder purred over it when a new (brass) anchor pin was soldered in.One palet needed adjustment and than it should have run!But it didn't! Finaly found a couple of bent teeth on the great center wheel:truly this clock has had a hard life before! I examined the wheel with a 10power loupe and found several bent teeth,some tips of others looked as if they were filed from sideways...It took me more than one hour to straighten the teeth with the blade of a small pointed skrew driver.After I did what I could I reassebled the mvmt. without the anchor and let it run through several times with the mainspring wound about a quarter of its power in the (vain) hope that the T3 pinion would do the rest of smoothing the gear.Than put everything together,set beat and now she's working for several hours.Rotation is about 220° with good overswing.Press Your thumbs!
Burkhard

001.JPG 002.JPG 003.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Pat L.

NAWCC Member
Jul 28, 2003
88
30
18
Country
Region
This one was received today from an online auction site. The serial number is 5862. The suspension spring was shown in the auction site pictures, but wasn't with the clock when it was received, except that the bottom block was found in the shipping box.

I think that the .0035" suspension spring is recommended for this clock. Is there a suspension unit diagram in the repair guide that should be followed for spacing of the blocks and fork?

Thanks for any advice on this.
 

Attachments

  • SuP-Backplate.JPG
    SuP-Backplate.JPG
    339.6 KB · Views: 85
  • SuP-Bottom.JPG
    SuP-Bottom.JPG
    344 KB · Views: 85
  • SuP-Dial.JPG
    SuP-Dial.JPG
    378.4 KB · Views: 100
  • SuP-Front.JPG
    SuP-Front.JPG
    246.1 KB · Views: 100
  • SuP-Pend+Block.JPG
    SuP-Pend+Block.JPG
    293.2 KB · Views: 87
  • SuP-Pendulum.JPG
    SuP-Pendulum.JPG
    251.2 KB · Views: 78
  • SuP-Top.jpg
    SuP-Top.jpg
    334 KB · Views: 76

KurtinSA

NAWCC Member
Nov 24, 2014
5,955
662
113
San Antonio, TX
Country
Region
I think that the .0035" suspension spring is recommended for this clock. Is there a suspension unit diagram in the repair guide that should be followed for spacing of the blocks and fork?

Yes there is. It's a good starting point for build up of a suspension unit.

Kurt
 

etmb61

NAWCC Member
Oct 25, 2010
3,302
500
113
Mascoutah, IL
Country
Region
Pat,

The repair guide does not identify any Schlenker & Posner clocks, so there is no diagram that is a match for your clock. The diagram for suspension Unit 1 in the guide is a good starting point because it has similar dimensions.
 

KurtinSA

NAWCC Member
Nov 24, 2014
5,955
662
113
San Antonio, TX
Country
Region

John Hubby

Senior Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
NAWCC Star Fellow
NAWCC Life Member
Sep 7, 2000
12,296
282
83
The Woodlands, TX
Country
Region
This one was received today from an online auction site. The serial number is 5862. The suspension spring was shown in the auction site pictures, but wasn't with the clock when it was received, except that the bottom block was found in the shipping box.

I think that the .0035" suspension spring is recommended for this clock. Is there a suspension unit diagram in the repair guide that should be followed for spacing of the blocks and fork?

Thanks for any advice on this.
Pat, thanks for posting the photos of your "new" Schlenker & Posner clock and your questions about it. As already noted, there are no Schlenker & Posner (SuP) back plates identified as such in the Repair Guide, not even the one that is stamped with their logo (Plate 1472H) or their name (Plate 1505). In fact there are six plates in the RG that were made by SuP, as follows:
Plates 1317, 1472H, 1490, 1505, 1529, 1559. Plate 1505 is incorrectly identified as a JUF, all the others are shown incorrectly as being made by Kundo.
This evidently came about due to Charles Terwilliger not knowing that SuP was a manufacturer of 400-Day clocks and not a trader or reseller, and that they appear to be quite similar to Kundo clocks. While there are similarities, there are many differences that I've listed in earlier posts.

Your clock was made in late 1928 based on the movement serial number. Also, the back plate is Plate 1317 but without the logo. I need to comment on that selection.
  • Your plate is identical to the layout of Plate 1317, which also does not have a suspension guard.
  • The year made is shown as 1911, however the actual year made was 1928 both for Plate 1317 and your clock. Schlenker & Posner was founded in late 1927 and started 400-Day production in early 1928.

The suspension unit is likely missing because this model has the earliest upper suspension bracket that does not have provision to fix the upper block in place. Instead, the pin through the upper block just rests in the two notches of the saddle and is free to come out. The bottom block you have is an original SuP block. Do use that when you assemble your suspension unit; also Eric's advice is good for a starting point. With regard to suspension spring strengths, I put together a table in Post #225 in this thread just a few months back, that lists the correct strengths for each of the SuP back plates that have been identified to date.

Your clock appears to be complete and original, and I'm sure it will clean up very nicely. Post some more photos when you have it completed.
 
Last edited:

Pat L.

NAWCC Member
Jul 28, 2003
88
30
18
Country
Region
Eric, John, Kurt,
Thanks a lot for the advice and information. I'll get to work on the suspension spring assembly right away and see if it might run. Thanks again. Pat L.
 

spresto9

Registered User
Oct 22, 2012
22
0
1
Clock in a box

Hi All,
I have just been given a colck in bits in a box, a friend had striped it but assures me that every part is there except the torsion spring!
The clock has no identfying marks apart from a serial number 5082, I have found a flowchart online to help identify it but am having problems as it dosn't seem to fit exactly with any of the makes.
I was wondering if any of the members here could recognise the clock from a photo of the back plate, the hight is 92.5mm width 68.8mm and thickness 2mm.
Any help would be greatly apresiated as this is the my first 400 day clock and I would dearly love to bring it back to life!
Many Thanks
Steve
PA Clock 2015-10-27 002 (800x600).jpg
 

shutterbug

Moderator
Staff member
NAWCC Member
Oct 19, 2005
49,926
3,157
113
North Carolina
Country
Region
Re: Clock in a box

Mostly guess work. It has some things in common with movements made by Wurth. It also is close to one made by Royal, and attributed to Schlenker and Posner - (SUP - plate 1490 in the book). Can you show us the pendulum and the rest of the clock?
 
Last edited:

JTD

Registered User
Sep 27, 2005
11,459
1,781
113
Country
Re: Clock in a box

Maybe my edition of Terwilliger is not the latest (10th) but in my copy plate # 1490 (Royal Clock Co.) is attributed to Kieninger & Obergfell, not Schlenker & Posner.

JTD
 

spresto9

Registered User
Oct 22, 2012
22
0
1
Re: Clock in a box

Hi, not sure how much help these will be as it realy is a box of bits! by the way the mainspring is 19mm wide and the barrel is 38.8mm inside dia.
Thanks
Steve
Steve 2015-10-27 002 (800x600).jpg 2015-10-27 003 (800x600).jpg 2015-10-27 004 (800x600).jpg
 

spresto9

Registered User
Oct 22, 2012
22
0
1
Re: Clock in a box

Hi Les,

That looks very similar apart from the two screws for the guard, could it be that as the clock I have is a much lower serial number that the guard was a later addition?

any idea approximately how old my clock could be?

Steve
 

lesbradley

NAWCC Member
Dec 20, 2007
1,040
6
38
Fairford, England
Visit site
Country
Region
Re: Clock in a box

Maybe my edition of Terwilliger is not the latest (10th) but in my copy plate # 1490 (Royal Clock Co.) is attributed to Kieninger & Obergfell, not Schlenker & Posner.

JTD
Your copy of Terwilliger is the latest edition but was printed in 1991. A lot more information has come to light since/ SUP were only identified as a maker a few years ago. Until then it was assumed they were Kundo
 

lesbradley

NAWCC Member
Dec 20, 2007
1,040
6
38
Fairford, England
Visit site
Country
Region
Re: Clock in a box

Hi Les,

That looks very similar apart from the two screws for the guard, could it be that as the clock I have is a much lower serial number that the guard was a later addition?

any idea approximately how old my clock could be?

Steve

My SUP has a guard but is not shown in the photo. The guard screws have probably been replaced.

Date is late 1928, early 1929.

Pretty sure the pendulum is from a JUF clock
 
Last edited:

JTD

Registered User
Sep 27, 2005
11,459
1,781
113
Country
Re: Clock in a box

Your copy of Terwilliger is the latest edition but was printed in 1991. A lot more information has come to light since/ SUP were only identified as a maker a few years ago. Until then it was assumed they were Kundo

Many thanks for the information - I didn't know about that development. I will make a note in my copy of Terwilliger and also in the Lexikon.

JTD
 

spresto9

Registered User
Oct 22, 2012
22
0
1
Re: Clock in a box

Thank you all for your help, I go ahead and order a .0036" spring and keep a look out for a no.37 pendulum to replace the non original one.
Steve.
 

spresto9

Registered User
Oct 22, 2012
22
0
1
Re: Clock in a box

Hi all,
I have almost finished restoring this Schlenker & Posner clock but have been unable to find the correct pendulum for it, I think it needs a no.37 like this.
no 37.jpg


I have decided to give the clock to a friend for Christmas and have a pendulum that runs the correct time but would prefer if it had the right one.

Do any of you know of somewhere in the UK I might find one? or have a spare they would be willing to swap for a spare Badische 5 ball
pendulum like th
is [FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]that I picked up to try
Pendulum Barlischer 2015-11-04 002 (450x600).jpg [FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]
[/FONT]
[/FONT]

any help finding the correct pendulum would be great

Thanks Steve
 

lesbradley

NAWCC Member
Dec 20, 2007
1,040
6
38
Fairford, England
Visit site
Country
Region
Re: Clock in a box

Hi all,
I have almost finished restoring this Schlenker & Posner clock but have been unable to find the correct pendulum for it, I think it needs a no.37 like this.
250869.jpg


I have decided to give the clock to a friend for Christmas and have a pendulum that runs the correct time but would prefer if it had the right one.

Do any of you know of somewhere in the UK I might find one? or have a spare they would be willing to swap for a spare Badische 5 ball
pendulum like th
is that I picked up to try
250870.jpg

any help finding the correct pendulum would be great

Thanks Steve

You've identified the right pendulum. Most likely only chance though is a scrap clock, unless one turns up on Ebay. You never know though someone might have one.
 
Last edited:

Burkhard Rasch

NAWCC Member
Jun 1, 2007
5,227
412
83
67
Twistringen
Country
Region
Re: Clock in a box

Your pic show a 3/5ball pendulum,often associated with Badische clocks.This is also a desirable pendulum for someone who has a Badische clock.Maybe someone here on the forum wants to swap pendulums with You? Sorry I neither have one You need nor need the one You have!
Good luck
Burkhard
 

MartinM

Registered User
Jun 24, 2011
3,154
142
63
El Dorado, CA
Country
Region
Re: Clock in a box

Hi all,
I have almost finished restoring this Schlenker & Posner clock but have been unable to find the correct pendulum for it, I think it needs a no.37 like this.
250869.jpg


I have decided to give the clock to a friend for Christmas and have a pendulum that runs the correct time but would prefer if it had the right one.

Do any of you know of somewhere in the UK I might find one? or have a spare they would be willing to swap for a spare Badische 5 ball
pendulum like th
is that I picked up to try
250870.jpg

any help finding the correct pendulum would be great

Thanks Steve
I think I might have one. It'll be ~7 hours till I'm off work and can check.
I'm in California, if that's a deal-breaker.
 
Know Your NAWCC Forums Rules!
RULES & GUIDELINES

Support the NAWCC

Forum Expense plus NAWCC
Goal
$1,000.00
Received
$360.00
36%
Host server
$250.00
Software support
$250.00
NAWCC operations
$500.00
Expenses

Forum statistics

Threads
181,345
Messages
1,582,322
Members
54,775
Latest member
Ghostsniper
Encyclopedia Pages
918
Total wiki contributions
3,126
Last edit
Hamilton Grade No. 947 Reported Examples by Kent
Top