Post Your Gustav Becker 400-Day Clocks Here

darek19670528

Registered User
May 17, 2015
21
2
3
Country
I found such a G.B Louvre No. 4434 with a disc pendulum

IMG_20210404_143434.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: gintarasb64

etmb61

NAWCC Member
Oct 25, 2010
2,859
295
83
Mascoutah, IL
Country
Region
Becker used the disk pendulums throughout their production. The ball pendulums were an option but they did not supersede the disks.

Eric
 

darek19670528

Registered User
May 17, 2015
21
2
3
Country
Cześć Eric, dziękuję za informację. Wysyłam zdjęcie mojego G.B Louvre numer 4038 i ma ono wahadło kulowe

20180610_091733.jpg
 

darek19670528

Registered User
May 17, 2015
21
2
3
Country
Eric, a tu zdjęcie tego samego zegara numer 4038 ale na chwilę zmieniłem wahadło

IMG_20210404_143434.jpg
 

etmb61

NAWCC Member
Oct 25, 2010
2,859
295
83
Mascoutah, IL
Country
Region
Eric, a tu zdjęcie tego samego zegara numer 4038 ale na chwilę zmieniłem wahadło

View attachment 647640
Hi Darek,

I reviewed my records again and of the 17 louvre clocks I have noted 6 (including yours) have ball pendulums and the rest have discs. The ball pendulums are slightly less common, even though they were introduced when all the other makers were abandoning the discs. I think they are more attractive and certainly better made than the later Becker disc pendulums.

Eric
 

gintarasb64

Registered User
Oct 1, 2012
228
26
28
Lithuania
Country
Hello,
Sharing pictures of my new GB 400 day clock. Very nice with Roman numbers dial and decorated dial ring, torsion pendulum. SN 2467855. Best regards
Gintaras

20210411_144309.jpg 20210411_143719.jpg 20210411_143808.jpg 20210411_143346.jpg 20210411_143734.jpg
 

darek19670528

Registered User
May 17, 2015
21
2
3
Country
Hello, a very nice clock, rarely seen with Roman numerals, it was probably a version for the USA and, moreover, a small number of these clocks with this dial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gintarasb64

gintarasb64

Registered User
Oct 1, 2012
228
26
28
Lithuania
Country
Hello, a very nice clock, rarely seen with Roman numerals, it was probably a version for the USA and, moreover, a small number of these clocks with this dial.
Another one GB 400 day clock, similiar to posted previously, just with small GB logo on the dial. SN 332 ( Junghans numbering).
Best regards
Gintaras

20210418_194441.jpg 20210418_194521.jpg 20210418_194456.jpg 20210418_194504.jpg
 

Darrmann39

NAWCC Member
Dec 6, 2020
331
48
28
54
Country
Bee, thanks very much for your inquiry and posting your GB clock. Eric is correct, GB changed their serial numbering system in May 1925, no longer posting sequential serial numbers for all their numbered clocks. Instead, they restarted numbering from "1" for at least five different types of movements. My data show your clock was made near the end of 1929. With regard to the change, we initially thought that was because GB was being taken over by Junghans at that time. It turns out the takeover didn't occur until May 1930 so that should not have had any influence on the change

Actually, GB first made this type of clock and movement design in 1902; the earliest serial number documented for that time is 1632604. At the time the numbering system was changed, the highest serial number recorded to date is 2508167; then dropping back to '1'. Your clock appears to be complete except for the suspension guard, exact replicas are available from the Horolovar Company or from eBay. The pendulum having a matching serial number to the movement shows this is the original pendulum. The Roman number dial was used on less than 10% of all the GB 400-Day clocks so it isn't all that common.

I am going to move your thread to be part of our thread "Post Your Gustav Becker 400-Day Clock Here" for continued discussion. We try to avoid having multiple makers discussed in the same thread.
glad i found this post. I recently got a GB 400 day clock for parts originally them i couldn't find myself to take it apart so 8 fixed it and it runs great. Thing it's serial# is 525. Was told it was mid 30s. But from what I'm reading here it would be more like 1925 would that be correct.
Then i got this other one that's numbered 2119487 could you give me a year that would have been.
Added some pics of my GB Skeleton just for the heck of it. Lol. Made my own base. Had a reproduction

Screenshot_20210424-190446_Gallery.jpg 20210324_164724.jpg 20210423_150814.jpg 20210424_171840.jpg 20210424_160344.jpg 20210205_120449.jpg
 

KurtinSA

NAWCC Member
Nov 24, 2014
4,523
294
83
San Antonio, TX
Country
Region
The "525" doesn't look like a serial number. I think it's just the last 3 digits of the full serial number. Often times, they stamp the other plate with the last 3 digits to keep things together.

As for the number 2119487, that appears to be the latter half of 1909.

Kurt
 

etmb61

NAWCC Member
Oct 25, 2010
2,859
295
83
Mascoutah, IL
Country
Region
The "525" doesn't look like a serial number. I think it's just the last 3 digits of the full serial number. Often times, they stamp the other plate with the last 3 digits to keep things together.

As for the number 2119487, that appears to be the latter half of 1909.

Kurt
Kurt,
525 is a good serial number for the late 1920s.

Eric
 

etmb61

NAWCC Member
Oct 25, 2010
2,859
295
83
Mascoutah, IL
Country
Region
H
I agree bit IMO the full serial number wouldn't be on the front plate or in that location from what I can see.

Kurt
Hi Kurt,
I believe the last three digits on the front plate was a standard Becker practice. If the serial number was only three digits you got the entire number. I took one of mine apart for you to see.
numbers.jpg

Here is an older plate as well.
numbers.jpg

Eric
 

KurtinSA

NAWCC Member
Nov 24, 2014
4,523
294
83
San Antonio, TX
Country
Region
Eric -

As usual, you seem to be correct. Nice that you went and tore down a clock just to confirm! :clap: I haven't taken any of my 1925+ Beckers apart yet so can't tell on them. But a few of the other pre 1925 clocks I have overhauled I do see stampings on the front plate. Most are the last three digits of the full serial number. One clock, though, only has the last two digits. So, a bit of an odd ball. I'll have to pay more attention whenever I take the others apart.

Kurt
 
Last edited:

gintarasb64

Registered User
Oct 1, 2012
228
26
28
Lithuania
Country
Gintaras thanks for posting. Very tardy reply, but your clock is one of those made in the first production run of the skeleton clocks in January 1910. About 600 clocks were made in this batch, the first 90 and the final 100 of this run being made for B. H. Abrahams of London and stamped with the BHA logo per Plate 1033. Your clock has plate 1189. As best I can tell the clock is completely original, only missing the suspension guard.

All of the clocks in this first batch were essentially identical, all with oval mahogany base with oval glass dome, stamped and embossed silver color metal dial with black numbers, and a standard GB disc pendulum. There are two in my data that have had the original pendulum replaced with a mis-matched serial number No. 17 chandelier style pendulum. This is very evidently due to Charles Terwilliger concluding that "all" the GB skeleton clocks would have the skeletonized No 17, when in fact less than half actually were originally fitted with that pendulum design.
Hello,
Sharing pictures of another GB 400 day clock with logo and SN on the front plate.
Regards
Gintaras

20210521_130257.jpg 20210521_125932.jpg 20210521_125910.jpg
 

KurtinSA

NAWCC Member
Nov 24, 2014
4,523
294
83
San Antonio, TX
Country
Region
It appears there is a faint "1" in front of the numbers...if so, that makes it first half of 1903. Somewhat unusual to me seeing the S/N there as well as the GB logo.

Kurt
 

KurtinSA

NAWCC Member
Nov 24, 2014
4,523
294
83
San Antonio, TX
Country
Region
Could it just be the photo angle? It does appear that the deck of the disk seems taller that most that I've seen. But the disks on the gallery look right as well as the pedestal that holds the gallery up.

Kurt
 

marylander

Registered User
Sep 9, 2008
883
39
28
Maryland
Country
Region
Hello,
Thank you for comments. Pendulum is without SN, but I think it match 1903 time period . See pictures.
Best regards
Gintaras

View attachment 655590 View attachment 655591 View attachment 655592
Hi Gintaras,
Thank you very much for the photos. Indeed, it is correct pendulum. When I used Ipad to look at your first post, I could not see the pendulum very well. with these new photos, it is very clear to me that it is the correct pendulum for the clock.
Ming
 
  • Like
Reactions: gintarasb64

Forum statistics

Threads
167,114
Messages
1,456,260
Members
87,316
Latest member
goodgoff
Encyclopedia Pages
1,057
Total wiki contributions
2,914
Last edit
E. Howard & Co. by Clint Geller