Most visitors online was 4107 , on 14 Jan 2023
The duplex was regarded as a very superior escapement, but was quite expensive to make, at least in the European forms, (leaving aside the Waterbury with its stamped out escape wheel), because of its tiny jewel roller, and demanded great precision in manufacture to achieve and maintain accuracy. The cylinder was a great improvement on the verge, which was its competitor when it was first developed in 1727, but the duplex was a further improvement, although still a frictional rest escapement like the cylinder, and apart from the detent, was the leader until the introduction of the detached lever in the early 19th century. One advantage of the duplex was that locking and impulse were achieved at different radii. Certainly in the UK, duplexes were never cheap.Duplex seems easier and cheaper to make… Was cylinder considered better than duplex?
You're probably right, the English trade made watches up to a standard, and the US 'dollar watch' trade made them down to a price. The Waterbury duplex is a remarkable production engineering achievement, and an example of what the English trade never got to grips with.Yes, English duplex watches are still not cheap (cylinders as well)
Maybe it is as simple that unlike in Europe, Americans simply found a way to produce a duplex watch cheaply![]()