Most visitors online was 4107 , on 14 Jan 2023
Likely.If you figure out the basic design could you simply tweak it for different movement sizes?
Thanks, where does one find these for sale (I suspect they are not available) or at least the dimensions?According to Ranfft, the stem is Stem W1547.
Where specifically did you find this on Ranfft? Can you provide a link?According to Ranfft, the stem is Stem W1547.
Where specifically did you find this on Ranfft? Can you provide a link?
Thanks - John
Close, though my specific movement is from the late 1870s or 1880s. But I suspect the stem might be the same.
I reckon it is worth a look.Close, though my specific movement is from the late 1870s or 1880s. But I suspect the stem might be the same.
I did not find my movement in the list of Longines watches, which looks like does not go back that far.
Not trying to replace the square x-section winding part that is sticking out of the movement (is that called a stem?) that the crown/stem (with female square hole in it) connects to. Rather I don't have a part that looks like this:The two movements are 18 LS from 1877 lever set.
You have the stem, why replace it? You must only
stretch the square. You can use a key of the verge
or a tube above the stem
Regards enrico
Thanks - I know exactly what people are recommending I do with these watch winding keys - I get it, but I'm looking for alternatives that are much less effort to get to work with my 3D printed cases. I have an engineering and machining background and this seems not workable to me as it will make the winding tube on my cases potentially way too long:Hi John, I can see where you are coming from, but I think what folks are saying is that you should get hold of a decent quality watch key that has the correct size to fit onto the protruding square of the winding arbor on your Longines. Once you have that, cut off and file/turn the steel portion of the key such that you have a female square section at each end. Positioning that onto your winding arbor will convert the arbor from a male to a female connection to the winding stem; you can then use a standard style male winding stem, which you can secure in the pendant as you describe, to wind the watch. Sure, there will probably need a bit of modification to allow the winding stem to fit securely into the 'connector', but it should work.
Hope I'm not trying to teach my granny how to suck eggs![]()
Yes, exactly my plan, but on ebay (where I can find them) they want something like $30+shipping each. Ouch.One other wrinkle.
The negative set system uses a stem spring. These are available and you may want to install them in your pendants. They normally are threaded.
Yes. You are officially AWESOME!
Sideways action with rotation - meaning it does not pull straight out - the little 1.5mm wide lever rotates as it comes out. Maybe you can see this in this photo:Not having one of these movements to hand, how does the setting lever actuate?
Is it a downwards pressure or a sideways action?
Yes, this is a problem I have not solved, but exposes the beauty of 3D printing as a design modification and re-print of the main body takes about 10 hours max. The front and back covers take about an hour to print and then about 1/2 hour clean-up.I was attempting to think about how you could relate that action to a button that could be better sealed than the gaping hole.
That is a beauty for sure! I really like these early Longines movements.Very nice idea! Please let me know when you start mass production! I have a 16D looking for a new home ...
View attachment 731441
Yes, fine threads would likely be too fragile with the resin that I'm currently using. Though there are some other resins that appear to be better for threads.Traditionally a setting lever would be accessed by screwing off the bezel. Is that a possibility? I understand that screw threads can be printed but whether at these necessary dimensions that would be sufficiently robust is a different question I guess. When made of metal they are prone to cross threading and other causes of thread damage if not handled carefully so, in resin, would that be too fragile?
Dial looks good, hands need to be replaced.What does the dial look like?
Nice. I tend to like more subtle design-ed dials and hands.Dial looks good, hands need to be replaced.
I learned that these 16D movements were shipped to Aikin, Lambert & Co. (a fountain pen manufacturer) and put into 16s gold cases. Later on they got scrapped for gold, that's why you find so many of them without case.
I'm looking for key wind 16s cases on Ebay, but I have no idea if the movement will really fit if I find one. I assume that the hole for the winding key is always in a different position, depending on the manufacturer.
View attachment 731611
Actually a hinged front cover might be doable - just need a good way to keep the front cover closed securely while being easy to open for setting.I have been trying to come up with a way to deal with lever setting.
I have a watch in a case intended for lever setting but it came with stem setting but the idea may be useful View attachment 732209
The watch has a second outer bezel. A hinged 3D printed bezel may be too much but you could make with bezel to hold the crystal and have the lever come through the inner bezel. A second bezel could snap over the inner and seal it .
Thanks. It can be better with better skill from me (took me 2 months to get barely proficient in printing dimensionally accurate 3D resin parts), better printer (mine is only $350 + $1K in all the other necessary stuff) as it's mainly meant for printing figures and such, better resins (I'm not using the REALLY expensive stuff yet), better post processing (all sorts of stuff you can do to make the case much nicer).Hi John,
I think your case is a most impressive use of this technology!
Regards,
Graham
Great idea, unfortunately plastic will not work well that way, especially this 3D printed plastic. What I'm working on is using a softer rubber o-ring that would be used for the snapping part so that there is no plastic-on-plastic interaction that would likely fail quickly. I will keep this in mind though and give something similar a try since it's very elegant, and see how durable it is.Hi John,
If you make the bezel ever so slightly elliptical with the minor axis on the 3/9 line, it should provide just enough 'snap' to keep it shut, provided you form the lips with the right profiles.
Regards,
Graham
Make sure you measure the stem.
A question, hope it doesn't break any rules.
A very nice quality orphan like this, how much would I expect to be out of pocket to purchase one?
A clear case is certainly an option and I will experiment with that kind of material.Well done John, and thanks for sharing your 3D printing lessons-learned with us. I'm completely ignorant of that technology.
I'd LOVE one day to have some kind of solution like that to more properly protect and display some of the several fine verge watch movements I own. In that case, the solution should also ideally allow viewing the movement from the side (clear sides on the case), to admire the internal components of the watches visible through the two plates. Would this be at all possible with 3D printing?
If I can ever get some decent lathe skills, I thought of just making cylinders of clear lucite (or something similar) with clear caps top and bottom, to protect and view the movements.
Here's such a verge movement to give you an idea (this one is from Julien Le Roy in Paris). In the meantime, I store them in small plastic containers as shown.
p.s. sorry didn't mean to hijack your Longines thread but thought I'd get some thoughts about manufactured cases for an older generation of watch movement.
Robert
View attachment 733698 View attachment 733700 View attachment 733701 View attachment 733702