Need help Id a wall clock.

[Andrew G.]

I've got this clock today. The case looks old, but movement looks very clean, I would even say "shiny" at some degree. My concern that it does not look old to me. There is no maker's trademark, no serial number. I hope posted pictures could give some clues. My guess, it is German made... movement looks more like F. Mauthe.

I would appreciate any ideas on how old this clock is and who might be the movement maker.
Thanks everyone!

 

[new2clocks]

I've got this clock today. The case looks old, but movement looks very clean, I would even say "shiny" at some degree. My concern that it does not look old to me. There is no maker's trademark, no serial number. I hope posted pictures could give some clues. My guess, it is German made... movement looks more like F. Mauthe.

I would appreciate any ideas on how old this clock is and who might be the movement maker.
Thanks everyone!

View attachment 533461 View attachment 533462 View attachment 533463 View attachment 533464 View attachment 533465 View attachment 533466 View attachment 533467 View attachment 533468 View attachment 533469 View attachment 533470 View attachment 533471 View attachment 533472

Andrew,

We have some contributors who can identify unmarked German movements. They should be along to provide their opinions.

By the looks of the clock, I estimate the year of production from 1895 to 1915, but that is just a guess.

Regards.

 

[bruce linde]

something about those curled brass edges on the seatboard and bracket look more modern to me....

 

[Andrew G.]

something about those curled brass edges on the seatboard and bracket look more modern to me....

Thanks Bruce. I also think the movement is most likely modern along with these brackets.

 

[Tatyana]

Hi all!
It is a Kienzle, recently had the same movement Gustav Becker?
Tatyana

 

[Andrew G.]

Hi all!
It is a Kienzle, recently had the same movement Gustav Becker?
Tatyana

Tatyana, thank you! The clock I have is very much the same as it mentioned in the post you referred to. It is Kienzle then, it makes sense. Is there any estimate on the year? In the other article, you mentioned 1920. Спасибо.