Moral dilema

Discussion in 'Lost or Stolen Horological Items' started by NigelW, Nov 18, 2019.

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  1. NigelW

    NigelW Registered User

    Jan 2, 2015
    401
    34
    28
    Male
    London and Kent
    Country Flag:
    Researching clocks by the maker of my current restoration project I came across a reference to a clock in the "stolen" section of a horological journal dated nearly 20 years ago, together with a police crime reference (in the UK). A clock fitting the exact description sold at auction last year. I didn't buy it, but should I inform someone? It is quite possible of course that the stolen clock was retrieved and sold legitimately.
     
  2. novicetimekeeper

    novicetimekeeper Registered User
    Donor

    Jul 26, 2015
    9,958
    648
    113
    Male
    retired and on my second career
    Dorset
    Country Flag:
    Region Flag:
    yes, you should report it. Whether anybody does anything about it is another thing entirely. Thefts of antiques are extremely damaging to our interests, and any chance of apprehending those who abet them should be taken.
     
    Dave T likes this.
  3. Jim DuBois

    Jim DuBois Registered User
    NAWCC Member Sponsor

    Jun 14, 2008
    2,861
    590
    113
    Male
    Magnolia, TX
    Country Flag:
    Region Flag:
    I would report it. Moral dilemmas tend to be painful for someone no matter what route is taken. But, right is still right, and if relevant information about a theft becomes apparent I would want it reported if the theft was of my property. Even as someone else property it still is the correct path is it not?
     
  4. NigelW

    NigelW Registered User

    Jan 2, 2015
    401
    34
    28
    Male
    London and Kent
    Country Flag:
    I reported it this morning. A fellow member of my clock club is a retired officer from the Met and agreed I should do so, but thought they probably wouldn't thank me privately for reopening a 20 year old case!

    This is the clock:

    George Etherington London circa 1700, an eight day long case clock with brass and silvered 12" sq

    And this is the ad in the June 2000 edition of the Horological Journal. It has to be the same one. Of course it may have been recovered and put up for sale legitimately.

    Screen Shot 2019-11-01 at 09.11.38.png
     
  5. novicetimekeeper

    novicetimekeeper Registered User
    Donor

    Jul 26, 2015
    9,958
    648
    113
    Male
    retired and on my second career
    Dorset
    Country Flag:
    Region Flag:
    Hard to believe two identical clocks were vandalised in the same way. I can't work out how they got everything to align, was the movement made especially for the dial or did it always have such high winding arbours? The movement does seem to have fuinned pillars, albeit adapted to screwed pillars rather than pinned, and the dial feet appear to have moved. Perhaps they made new plates and kept the old pillars, nevertheless, it is vandalism. This clock would have been pretty worthless in 1900 so they wouldn't have seen it as such at the time.
     
  6. NigelW

    NigelW Registered User

    Jan 2, 2015
    401
    34
    28
    Male
    London and Kent
    Country Flag:
    Nice case. I agree that some of the old parts may have been reused, but the position of the winders is most odd.
     
  7. novicetimekeeper

    novicetimekeeper Registered User
    Donor

    Jul 26, 2015
    9,958
    648
    113
    Male
    retired and on my second career
    Dorset
    Country Flag:
    Region Flag:
    Yes, the case is lovely, I could use that.
     

Share This Page