Most visitors online was 1660 , on 12 Dec 2020
I was hoping that someone could tell the maker from the backplate... However I can see that, without a trademark, it could be difficultThese may belong in generic German movements since various German makers made these without signing them.
Hi Jim,I have a similar clock and it says HAC on a metal tag in the bottom of the case.
I believe this is American Hamburg, The logo is the crossed arrows stamped into the movement on mine.
Has the same pendulum suspension and seat board arrangement.
There was apparently a stigma over German products at this time and I am told that is why they didn't brand things.
Jim
Many German clocks were unsigned as the German manufacturers sold "loose" movements to the trade (wholesalers, distributors, retailers, etc.). Some movements were signed some unsigned. This was a common practice in the German (and French) clock industry.I have a similar clock and it says HAC on a metal tag in the bottom of the case.
I believe this is American Hamburg, The logo is the crossed arrows stamped into the movement on mine.
Has the same pendulum suspension and seat board arrangement.
There was apparently a stigma over German products at this time and I am told that is why they didn't brand things.
Jim
My guess would be an unmarked Kienzle, but this is just a guess.Hi,
I just picked up this likely German box clock today.
No makers marks I can see
Strikes on a gong
Count wheel
Any idea who the maker is?
And a possible date of manufacture for the clock?
I can provide additional photos
Any info greatly appreciated
Dugald McIntosh
View attachment 641750 View attachment 641749 View attachment 641751 View attachment 641752 View attachment 641753
The countwheel on the front plate was used by Kienzle.I thought Kienzle too, since the pieces that keep the spring click ratchets in place (what are they called?) have a pointed shape, just like my other Kienzle View attachment 641769
So do we have enough evidence to safely say this is a Kienzle?The countwheel on the front plate was used by Kienzle.
Most of the unmarked box clock movements were from either Kienzle or Mauthe.
Regards.
The piece I was referring to in particular is that black circular one I had my finger on, but thanks anyway. That Mauthe fraction thing is quite interesting, as that might help ID another unmarked movement I have, which has a fraction on it.Yes, I think it is Kienzle and not Mauthe because Mauthe would have a fraction on the back plate. The spring that keeps the ratchets in place is called a click spring.
Kienzle was a major user of the patent for front plate countwheel. There are many examples of Kienzle movements that were marked with the Kienzle trademark and utilized the front countwheel.So do we have enough evidence to safely say this is a Kienzle?
Thanks for the info
I don't think he is referring to the click springs, I think he is talking about the dark colored 'keepers' which are positioned over the click wheels (read post #8 again).The spring that keeps the ratchets in place is called a click spring.
Yes that's it. ThanksI don't think he is referring to the click springs, I think he is talking about the dark colored 'keepers' which are positioned over the click wheels (read post #8 again).
JTD
Haller AG was purchased by Kienzle in 1928.Ok, so I did a bit more Internet digging and I came across this - Box regulator - Haller A.G. - around 1950
So, I guess it's a Haller? I heard they had ties with Kienzle
The listing showed a clock with an identical movement (which also looked unmarked) but a dial marked Haller AG with the sunrise gear logo. The style of the case however looked a fair bit later than that of mine, probably 30's (based on my very limited knowledge of case styles), so there is a good chance that clock was made after 28, and therefore had a movement by Kienzle.
Haller AG was purchased by Kienzle in 1928.
If the referenced clock is truly marked Haller AG, it most likely is a Kienzle movement. I say "if" since most sellers confuse Haller AG with Thomas Haller AG. NOTE - I could not open the listing.
I also do not believe the referenced clock is from 1950.
I believe your clock is a Kienzle from a time period prior to the Kienzle purchase of Haller AG.
Regards.