Do sometimes wonder if we'd be farther ahead with our trademarks and trademarks dating if all the "registered" dates in Kochmann were redone. Too often this is what we're doing.
Zep, THANK YOU!! for digging this up. I now use the trademark dates in Kochmann with great trepidation, and your post gives the perfect reason why . . . firstly with a trademark I've never seen before on a date the double elephant was "supposed" to be registered, and then the double elephant on a date that is MUCH more consistent with information I have compiled empirically. Certainly explains why that "twofer pachyderm on alarum clock" didn't show up until the 1920's (assuming it wasn't registered earlier) among other revelations.
One of the revelations being the use of the name "Jahresuhren-Fabrik Gmbh Aug. Schatz & Söhne" in 1921 when their "official" 1981 100-Year History quotes that reorganization was in 1923 . . .

Also, that the circular logo "Jahresuhren-Fabrik GmbH Germany" was supposedly registered the same date as the double elephant, again according to Kochmann. It would be a marvellous find to know exactly when that logo was actually first registered.
Back to the drawing board, this will without doubt cause a shift in my dating information for JUF clocks . . .
