FWIW, the later 972's have "17 Extra Fine Jewels in Gold Setting, Steel Escape Wheel", according to the late Lowell Halligan.
Robert
Robert
Frank,Recently I was lookup a Hamilton 964 serial number in the LASSER'S LIST book and noticed three runs for 964s that were shown as 964L, (lever set movements).
I don't recall reading any comments in the previous posts about 964L, (lever set) movements, but it has been some some since I went thru all the posts.
I am assuming the three runs with the 964L designation in the LASSER'S LIST is an error
Howard Lasser said:16s Lever sets were not made that early! There were some lever sets that were factory modifications and as you know this was randomly done. There is one in Grade 964 movement and I don't remember the serial number, but I can come up with it, if needed. There were no Grade 962's unless they were modified at the factory or by a watchmaker.
Fondest regards, Howard
Nice Fred!An unusual one I recently had, a 965 marked with the grade number ...
Jim,Now for the scarcest of the 960 Series, the 967 with only 300 Produced. It may be less than 300. I have in Col. Townsend's notes that 28 were finished as 969, which would reduce the number to 272.
I wonder how many have survived, especially with grade number on the plates and a plain looking 3/4 plate 17 jewel movement.
When I started looking for one of these watches I looked for over 5 years. I looked in pawn shops, private auctions, Nawcc shows, other collectors, ebay , etc. and then I found 3 within a months time.
I am back down to one at the moment. I sold the others to fellow collectors who couldn't locate one. That what's it is all about.
The numbers I have owned are 53,943, 53,947 & 59,355.
Warning, there is a pieced up mess out there, serial number
53,946, with 3 different plates.
This is 59,355 , 2 views
ThanksRichard,
This is what Halligan says about them,Hamilton did not keep good record until after 1900, so we would have to see advertising on these watches .
Howard Lasser wrote a bulletin article on them, It was Dec. 2008, Called,Henry J. Cain and 16s Movements, a chart on the 2nd pages says they were were adjusted to Temperature & positions ( I would assume 3) because the chart shows the 968/969 adjusted to 5 positions .
View attachment 669879 View attachment 669880
I have not seen enough of these to know if the dial is correct or not but you have a very scarce and beautiful watch. Maybe Rhett or Jim will chime in on the dial.Just picked up this (from what I'm told) all original Hamilton 969 in a full hunter case. One thing that gets me is that it's a private label (LO Hulberg, Northfield, Minn.) but pretty common hamilton dial. None the less, pretty excited to own this rather uncommon watch.
There are records of who Hamilton used as distributors and Otto Young of Chicago was a large and well known distributor. When Hamilton started out they mostly sold directly to jewelers but as time went on and they got bigger they mostly sold through distributors. The name Otto Young is found often in these Hamilton records. Many of the watches that Otto Young is seen as receiving are private labels for jewelers all over the Midwest.You mention Otto Young was likely a distributor that would have sold it to the private label jeweler. Are there records that Otto was a distributor or could that have been a customer of the jeweler? I'm fairly new at this and I'm not familiar with how records were kept.
NAWCC members, including my father, helped me when I was starting and they continue to help me today. The least any of us can do is help, and on top of that most of us love this nerdy stuff. The help all of us give is a labor of love. You have come to the right place for watch info. Nobody but the NAWCC has this Hamilton info.Fascinating! I fell in love with pocket watches purely for the mechanism aspect but the more I learn the more enamored I become with the everything about them. It helps to have experts like yourself so willing to take the time to pass along the information you've collected. It's appreciated beyond belief!