Most visitors online was 4107 , on 14 Jan 2023
Try posting in the "European & Other Pocket Watches" forum. It certainly looks like the many I've seen online.
Thanks but not the same.
While the one you are showing here is 47mm across mine is 40.6mm.Hi,
The same one with a superior finish and it is certified :
Patek Philippe, montre de poche en orPatek Philippe, montre de poche en or, vente aux enchères mercredi 13 avril à 15 heureswww.expertisez.com
Thank you for your reply. So no numbers nor signatures on the movement is normal for PP from this period? Someone posted a link to one about 7mm bigger that was from 1830s.The movement looks like Patek Phillippe movement in that serial number range. The third wheel jewel has been replaced.
It is a very fine watch
Very rare Movado Zenith 18K gold pocket watch powered by an ultra thin 17 jewels Movado Zenith wristwatch movement. This is the classic Movado Museum dial design which was so successful for Movado. The minimalist dial was inspired by Bauhaus designs. The solid gold dial has a machine circular texture made by turning the disc on a lathe. Then the Sun image positioned at noon position was thereafter milled leaving a high polish surface. Black coated hands make a nice contrast. The watch measures 38 mm across. I found a couple of wrist watches with a similar but smaller case and an identical dial for sale on the Internet. One in 18K yellow gold and one in 18K white gold. The back has a factory number 30 0280 535
Since introduction in 1925 for many decades the thinnest movement, just in the recent years underscored by the Audemars Piguet 2003, slightly lower with 1.64mm.
escapement wheel in Lubrifix 66, later Kif Duofix
since about 1985 shock absorber Kif Ultraflex
Example, year: signature; shock device
ca. 1960: Bucherer, Swiss, 3 Adj, 17 Jewels
(Frederic Piguet 21, 18000A/h, Lubrifix 66)
Used by many, including Zenith.
and I may ask, you say the dial is solid gold. Is is stamped anywhere?
I understood and could not answer in the affirmative as to stamp.It was only a question.
yes, just rushing and making mistakeThink you mean alleviated?
Anyway, where did I say it wasn't a Patek?
I can't see where anybody did.