Another clock I am looking at puzzles me as well.
Dial (brass), movement, and maker signature clearly say late 1700s, so lets take that for granted. But is it a "second use" of a longcase movement?
Arguments for this hypothesis are:
- No alarm function
- 14 days running time
- Dial with arch
Arguments against this hypothesis are:
- Dial width less than 10 inch (about 8.5 inch)
- No strike work
What would you think about such a hooded clock?
Cheers, Bernhard
Dial (brass), movement, and maker signature clearly say late 1700s, so lets take that for granted. But is it a "second use" of a longcase movement?
Arguments for this hypothesis are:
- No alarm function
- 14 days running time
- Dial with arch
Arguments against this hypothesis are:
- Dial width less than 10 inch (about 8.5 inch)
- No strike work
What would you think about such a hooded clock?
Cheers, Bernhard