For the price I paid I was willing to pay for an education. I think the movement may be in the wrong case, but haven't examined it closely enough to come to that definite conclusion. I don't recognize the movement. It seems to be some sort of small strap movement. The verge is almost certainly the wrong one. I have not cleaned or taken this movement apart yet. It would be great if someone recognized the movement and a possible maker. There is a paper plastered to the backboard, but nothing was printed on it. Over this, it looks like Silas Terry pasted his own label. There is also a watchmaker's label pasted to the backboard. I have both top and bottom doors. The bottom tablet is reverse painted but has lost about 50%.
Jim: Inclined to believe that too. Do you recognize the movement? Is it American? Here are some more pictures. Maybe the dial is original to the movement?
The same basic movement in an S.B. Terry clock is shown on page 187, figs. 94A-B, in Roberts and Taylor's book, The Contributions of Joseph Ives, etc. The clock has a similar dial.
Steven, I think you are correct. It is not a common version of movement by S.B. Terry. That was my first take, that it was just as its label suggests, but my file copy of the Marshall and Adams popped up. So, now the question becomes did Marshall & Adams use or copy an SB Terry movement? Nice find jboger. S.B. Terry clocks still command a bit of a premium price, even today.
I believe you have an absolutely WONDERFUL original clock!!! The movement is a strap brass front plate/solid back plate movement shelf clock made by "Silas B. Terry, Horologist" as is stated on I believe the absolutely correct label. Love the brass disk seconds bit which SBT used on other clocks with different movements, too. You'll find other examples of SBT empire clocks with that seconds bit in the references listed below. See Roberts' Joseph Ives book, 2nd edition, page 187. Again, note the dial. Also see Chris Bailey's article: https://docs.nawcc.org/Bulletins/2000/articles/2008/374/374_286.pdf Here's the relevant movement pic and caption: Jim is correct in that Marshal and Adams and then E.W. Adams of upstate NY made a very similar movement. See this thread where I discuss this: Oh gee whiz... Also see: https://docs.nawcc.org/Bulletins/1980/articles/1988/254/254_239.pdf Scroll down to page 241. Take a look at: https://docs.nawcc.org/Bulletins/2010/articles/2010/385/385_201.pdf Both show other SBT movements with the same seconds bit. For a similar case see Roberts' and Taylor's Eli Terry book, 2nd edition, page 322. Also note the dial and the label. That's what SBT did. Pasted that style of label on a plain brownish paper backboard covering. He did the same in other styles of clocks with different labels. Right as rain. My apparently clueless good friend, you have a horological treasure. A survivor in what appears to be original finish. Dust it off and admire. RM
Then it was worth the 80-mile drive and the wait until the auctioneer got around to it. The clock was in the back of a barn-like building in Shrewsbury, PA. The doors were off, the weights were out. Yes, it has a solid back plate and a seconds hand. the plates are heavy brass, at least heavier than the typical strap movement. The case is of very solid construction. The pulleys are not wood; they are brass. They too look undisturbed. The tablet is of a building in London. I'll look it up. Unfortuantley the building has flaked away. The verge is wrong. Is that something someone of ordinary mechanical ability can replace? I won't be able to get to this clock for awhile. I still need to reassemble the MItchell groaner I got two weeks ago. I guess I've been lucky the last couple of times. John
Tentatively, they copied, which is what RM suggests. Two things I note, and I don't want to make too much of them because I haven't the experience with these movements, are the different orientations of the rivets on the upper cross straps of the Terry and the Marshall & Adams movements, and the difference in the number of rivets holding on the small side straps on the left side of the movements. Maybe not significant, however.
On what basis do you say the verge is wrong? From what I can see, the escape wheel is correct. See the pic of the movement I've posted. Don't go changing things that shouldn't be changed. This is a scarce clock. RM
At the risk of belaboring things, here's another example that I consider vastly inferior to yours: Unlike yours, all shiny refinished, repop glass. Crest is quite artistic but a replacement and IMCO, not correct. Also, back board bereft of plain paper lining with the overpaste Silas B. Terry, Horlogist label. HOWEVER, note dial and it has your movement also with that seconds bit: Your long trip then wait I think was time well spent. RM
The tablet is a puzzle. There is indeed a Knowsley Hall in the UK, and from what remains of the picture, it looks right. However, it is not in London. Knowsley Hall is a very large 'stately home' not far from Liverpool, which is a long way from London. I wonder if the table maker didn't know, or thought that London would sound more impressive than Liverpool for the customer. (You can look it up on line if you want to see pictures). I see the words 'We aim to please' on the lower part of the tablet. I wonder who is 'speaking'? JTD
There are wooden works clocks with stenciled splats that incorporate the “We Aim to Please” phrase, too. I have a Terry transition clock that I have posted previously with that. Used on clocks by others as well. Don’t believe I have seen it used on a tablet before. Probably was a statement by the maker assuring satisfaction with the clock to the buyer. The Terry transition I mentioned above also has a tablet depicting an English manor house. If I have time will try to repost pix at some point. Years ago had a Hoadley with a tablet depicting Knowlesly Hall. One of those clocks I kick myself for not keeping. This clock just keeps getting better. RM
The discussion has been very interesting. Yes, Knowsley Hall is not in London. Don't know why I thought that. I looked it up on Wikipedia. The great house still stands and is still owned by the same family for hundreds of years. The hall is rented out for conventions, weddings, etc.I can not reconstruct what the tablet looked like as too much of the house is gone. But perhaps the tablet was copied from a print ca. 1830 or so. I found this listing in an 1860 Baltimore city directory: Ostendorf Anthony, watchmaker, 120 Saratoga The reference is: Full text of "Woods' Baltimore city directory (1860)" and then did a "Find" on "Ostendorf". The name occurs frequently. The town of Shrewsbury, Pa, is on the Maryland/Pennsylvania border north of Baltimore. So perhaps the clock has not wandered too far from home. The dial is attached in a rather cumbersome fashion to the case and not so easily removed. Something does not seem "right" about the verge. The escape wheel is fine. But a rocking of the pendulum rod makes the second hand go backwards. Perhaps the verge is flipped over to the wrong side? I don't want to start taking this apart as I have too many things in disassembled states; I don't want to add to them. But I will take some more pictures today, of the back, of the dial and how it is attached.
I suppose you thought 'London' because that is what it says on the tablet. That is the puzzling thing. JTD
Yes, that is why I thought that. Later, after returning home with the clock, I looked the great house up and found that it was near Liverpool only to forget that the tablet stated London.
And some pictures of the back. I forgot to take pictures of the dial and how it is attached to the case; that'll be tomorrow. There is the remnants of what looks to be an old newspaper on the back.
