She does not appear to have read this thread.
I'm not looking to pile on here(sorry Tom

) but
Jim Haney and some of the other long time members have made
a reasonable request to understand what the "numbers" were at the National. I did not pay for
a table(or tables) but if I did I probably would also like to know the numerical results from the National. I may
or may not agree with others here how to interpret them, but information is a necessary tool for all to make
intelligent decisions and have intelligent discussions. Transparency is a good thing.
If this isn't the place to post this type of question RE, "She does not appear to have read this thread." than there should
be a place to ask these questions. I assume that it is normal(within the rules of the NAWCC) that
this information is to be disseminated to the members, if I'm wrong let me know.
In the end it's the BOD and the President of the organisation who will make the final
decisions if there were to be changes based on these numbers so there is nothing wrong
with disclosing them for discussion. I also understand that it does take time to put
a report together, but does Lu even know these members are asking for it here in
in the NAWCC Event section?
Rob