You're probably right, but since I'm learning and enjoy making stuff, why not give it a shot? All pinions and wheels do not seem to have any appreciable wear. After cleaning, pivots seem to fit closely in their holes with appropriate tilt and shake. Train movements spin easily and quietly (no pivot chatter in oversize / misshaped holes) with the lightest touch without the escapement or fly governor. Strike side operates, but while I'm, doing it I'll probably bush that barrel too. It's not as loose as the time side, but could be a better fit.
Sounds like a plan, and a good learning experience.
Any clock with some years on it will have some wear throughout the movement, that's a matter of fact. However, one should not assume that every point of wear is a problem or that the entire movement is ready for a rebuild. Pivot hole (bushing) locations must be precisely located, and the best locations are the original holes from the factory. Armature bushing installations, and even some "professional" installations, are often less than perfect. If this clock's pivot holes show only minor wear, the well-intended installation of a bunch of bushings may provide an opportunity to introduce problems where none existed and do little or nothing to improve the overall health of the clock. This isn't to say that pivot holes with significant should wear not be bushed.
When just one point shows excessive wear and everything else just reflects normal age-related wear, one must answer the question, why, and to the extent possible, correct the underlying problem so you won't experience another premature failure of the same part.
RC