When changing a mainspring on the earlier model 57's, I have noted that the pillars beside the mainspring barrel are set too closely to permit the mainspring barrel to slip out. Thus, the plates must be disassembled to change a mainspring, and the barrel must be laid between the plates when reassembling. On later model 57's, the mainspring barrel will slip out and back in to change a mainspring.
I measured the distance of the pillars from the early to the later. The distance between the pillars center to center on the early 57's is just over 23 mm. The distance for the later ones is just over 24 mm. This 1mm change is enough to allow the mainspring barrel to be removed.
Obviously, AW Co re-engineered the model 57 at some time to allow the mainspring barrel to be removed. My guess is that it occurred around 350,000 SN. This was probably done due to complaints of watchmakers on the extra time needed to change a mainspring.
Now for the questions.
Has anyone ever seen a technical bulletin from AW Co announcing that they did this?
Does anyone else have any definitive info as to actually when this change occurred?
A curious mind wants to know.
Tom
I measured the distance of the pillars from the early to the later. The distance between the pillars center to center on the early 57's is just over 23 mm. The distance for the later ones is just over 24 mm. This 1mm change is enough to allow the mainspring barrel to be removed.
Obviously, AW Co re-engineered the model 57 at some time to allow the mainspring barrel to be removed. My guess is that it occurred around 350,000 SN. This was probably done due to complaints of watchmakers on the extra time needed to change a mainspring.
Now for the questions.
Has anyone ever seen a technical bulletin from AW Co announcing that they did this?
Does anyone else have any definitive info as to actually when this change occurred?
A curious mind wants to know.
Tom