Goal: $300, Received: $55.00 (18%) Contribute Now
Donate whatever you can or Join the 14,000 other NAWCC members for only $80 (plus $10 for hard copy publications). Check it out here.


NOTICE Notice: This is an old thread. The last post was 3102 days ago. If your post is not directly related to this discussion please consider making a new thread.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Thumbs up BOOKREVIEW: Watkins - Mainspring Gauges and the Dennison Combined Gauge

    BOOKREVIEW

    What exactly do the Historic Mainspring Gauges for Pocketwatches measure?


    Mainspring Gauges and the Dennison Combined Gauge, by Richard Watkins. Published 2008 by the author, Tasmania, Australia; published as a downloadable and printable PDF file;, 50 pages, 28x21 cm, No ISBN number. 16 figures, 15 tales, 27 graphs; text in English. Available for free download at the author’s website http://www.watkinsr.id.au/ .

    Regular readers of the NAWCC Bulletin are probably familiar with Richard Watkins, the Australian pocket watch enthusiast, for his series of recent articles on ‘Practical Watch Collecting for the Beginner”, but may not know that he is a prolific producer of other horological publications. He deserves credit for publishing (mostly as free web-downloads) his English language translations of French horological classics, as well as a comprehensive Bibliography of the Mechanical Watch.

    His never-ending quest for horological knowledge and insights has recently led him to investigate the tools which pocket watch repair people for over a hundred years had used to determine what replacement mainspring to order. These pocket sized gauges are designed to roughly measure the height and thickness of a spring and in some cases the size of a spring barrel.

    Watkins is a most thorough researcher, who knows the horological literature well, but found only the most skimpy information on the subject in old or current publications. So he started to thoroughly investigate about a dozen gauges in his own collection and in the possession of some friends. These were made in France, Switzerland, Britain and the USA. The results are now available in the small monograph under review.

    In summary he found that:
    • The gauges by different makers use different and incompatible units of measure
    • The gauges provide a “Number” for mainspring height and a “Number” for mainspring thickness, but not a ‘dimension’ (e.g. a “Number 8 “ for height does not translate in twice the height for a “Number 4”).
    • Numeric analysis showed that most of the gauges, even those from continental Europe in the early 20th century, are based on subdivions of an ‘inch’ rather than metric; some gauges are based on British inches, some on French, and none indicate what they are based on.
    • Many of the gauges contain inconsitencies in their design and their construction.
    • All of them are highly inaccurate measuring tools.

    The new paper by Watkins adds much needed insight into a hereto under documented corner of the study of horological tools, and the author is to be congratulated for tackling the subject in his usual thorough and thoughtful manner.

    Fortunat Mueller-Maerki. Sussex NJ January 25, 2008




    .
    Fortunat Mueller-Maerki, -Chair NAWCC Library Com./ Editor & Publisher of BHM
    Mem.NAWCC Mus.Coll.Com. / VP, USA Sect. Antiq.Horolog.Soc.

  2. #2

    Default Re: BOOKREVIEW: Watkins - Mainspring Gauges and the Dennison Combined Gauge (By: Fortunat Mueller-Maerki)

    Fortunat, your review has reminded me of something that briefly entered my head and then disappeared.

    I did not come across any English mainspring gauges, only French Swiss and American.

    So I don't know how the English measured mainsprings.

  3. #3
    Registered user. kirxklox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Dardanell, AR
    Posts
    4,387

    Default Re: BOOKREVIEW: Watkins - Mainspring Gauges and the Dennison Combined Gauge (By: Richard Watkins)

    Richard: Here is a starting point for further research.

    http://www.kirxklox.com/project/editorial_cms.php?id=14

  4. #4

    Default Re: BOOKREVIEW: Watkins - Mainspring Gauges and the Dennison Combined Gauge (By: kirxklox)

    It is very interesting that Junod decided to use 1/244th of an ENGLISH ligne; that is 1/2 of 1/12 of an English douzieme. It supports my view that some mainspring gauges used this size except based on the French inch.

    Unfortunately (or fortunately?) I will leave research into jewel gauging to someone else.

  5. #5
    Registered user. kirxklox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Dardanell, AR
    Posts
    4,387

    Default Re: BOOKREVIEW: Watkins - Mainspring Gauges and the Dennison Combined Gauge (By: Richard Watkins)

    Junod was also doing Loups, Magnifiers, and Micro Gauges. All you will find about it in this article is small bylines, but it does bring up some interesting questions.

Similar Threads

  1. Mainspring Gauges and the Dennison Combined Gauge Tool
    By Fortunat Mueller-Maerki in forum Horological Tools
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-26-2009, 05:06 PM
  2. Mainspring Gauges and the Dennison Combined Gauge
    By Richard Watkins in forum Horological Books
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-26-2009, 11:24 AM
  3. Replacement jewels, and the jacot tool...
    By RunesS in forum Watch Repair
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-17-2006, 10:58 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-02-2004, 10:47 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •