Goal: $300, Received: $165.00 (55%) Contribute Now
Donate whatever you can or Join the 14,000 other NAWCC members for only $80 (plus $10 for hard copy publications). Check it out here.



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27
  1. #1

    Default Waterbury Weights?

    I recently bought a Waterbury No. 2 Regulatory clock (first picture). It’s an eight day, time only weight driven clock. You can find it on page 173 of Tran Duy Ly’s “Waterbury Clocks and Watches”. Circa 1891. I’m wondering if the weights are correct for that clock (second picture). When I first swing the pendulum, it makes slight contact with the weights until it’s swing evens out. The weights are both 5 5/8” in circumference and 4 7/8” tall. The weight on the right side of the picture weights about 3.4 lbs. and the one on the left weighs 4.4 lbs. The clock will work for a few days and then stops. I haven’t even taken to dial off, so I have no clue why it’s not running for a full week. It might not have anything to do with my question about the weights.

    I’d appreciate any help or thoughts anyone can give me.

    Thanks.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Waterbury Weights.jpg 
Views:	137 
Size:	116.7 KB 
ID:	339217   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Waterbury No. 2.jpg 
Views:	1567 
Size:	253.8 KB 
ID:	339216  

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Williamson County, Texas
    Posts
    775

    Default Re: Waterbury Waits?

    If the pendulum hits the weights, try inserting a shim behind the bottom of the case. That may shift the geometry between the pendulum and weights enough to clear. Worth a try, anyway.

    I find it surprising that the weights are different on a time-only clock. My surprise is based purely on ignorance, however. It's entirely possible that they're supposed to be that way, and I'm sure someone with a clue will chime in.

    How long has it been since the clock was overhauled? Wear or dirt or both are about the only causes that I know of for a weight-driven clock to run short. That is assuming the weight cables are the right length, and they're not snagged, and all that, and assuming the weights will descend fully to the bottom of the case or the ends of the cables. If you don't know when or if it was ever worked on, or if it has been more than a few years, that would be Step 1. A good cleaning and repair of any issues will both protect the clock and help it run as well as it can.

    Good luck!
    Glen

  3. #3

    Default Re: Waterbury Waits? (By: glenhead)

    nice clock... but so many things need to be checked, all starting with removing the dial and seeing what lies beneath. almost certainly needs cleaning/servicing... which would address all issues and guarantee good running for next period of time.

    the weights look similar, but not identical... suspect. if it's a time-only, they should be the same. not sure what original spec would have been, but maybe someone here will know. i would guess 3.5 lbs on either side would be fine if serviced... but just a guess.
    i collect antique clocks because i get all that extra time...

  4. #4

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: JST)

    Most Waterburys with this movement have thin cigar box shaped weights that are hidden in the sides of a wider case. I don't recall seeing this movement in a case with so little space at the sides.
    I'm pretty sure that factory weights would be identical.
    Willie X

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Whitby, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    359

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: JST)

    Hello JST,

    Merritt's still sells it as part number CW 117 (Timesavers no longer carries it). I found an image on Google Images by searching "Waterbury weight". It fits Willy X's description perfectly.

    Jim

  6. #6

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: Jim Hartog)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Hartog View Post
    Hello JST,Merritt's still sells it as part number CW 117 (Timesavers no longer carries it). I found an image on Google Images by searching "Waterbury weight". It fits Willy X's description perfectly.
    Jim


    willie said 'most'... and we haven't seen what the inside of the case... or behind the dial... looks like. i think the brass weights look more appropriate for this kind of time-only wall hanger, but we obviously need more photos, please!!!! 8-)
    i collect antique clocks because i get all that extra time...

  7. #7

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: Jim Hartog)

    Thanks to everybody for their advice. Frankly, I am shocked to think that the case has been altered. I’ve looked it over carefully before buying it, and didn’t see any signs of alterations. But, as Willie X points out, that would explain things. I’m not at home this week, so I can’t measure the case. Can somebody tell me what the width and depth should be? Jim H, thanks for finding the weight that Willie X was describing.

    I need your guy’s advice. Realizing I don’t have the actual dimensions of the case with me, do you think the CW117 weights would work? Thanks again for all the help.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: JST)

    Quote Originally Posted by JST View Post
    Thanks to everybody for their advice. Frankly, I am shocked to think that the case has been altered. I’ve looked it over carefully before buying it, and didn’t see any signs of alterations. But, as Willie X points out, that would explain things. I’m not at home this week, so I can’t measure the case. Can somebody tell me what the width and depth should be? Jim H, thanks for finding the weight that Willie X was describing. I need your guy’s advice. Realizing I don’t have the actual dimensions of the case with me, do you think the CW117 weights would work? Thanks again for all the help.


    wait wait wait... we need to see more photos of the inside of the case... AND... the clock should run with those weights. even if one is lighter (or one heavier) than it should be, the fact that it stops is not due to the weights. it almost certainly needs cleaning and/or servicing to know for sure.

    because it's a time-only, both of the weights drive great wheels that BOTH drive the clock... meaning it should run on just one of the weights, i.e., while you're winding it.

    it would be be really helpful to confirm the movement by actually seeing it, to see how the weights are suspended, any wear marks or channels on the sides of the case where the weights travel, etc.

    don't get ahead of yourself by buying weights you probably don't need, and that may not be appropriate for that clock.

    methinks the brass weights are appropriate and look mo' bettah.

    are you comfortable removing the dial? if not, at least please open the door and take as many photos as you can.
    i collect antique clocks because i get all that extra time...

  9. #9

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: JST)

    Smike, you posted to the thread as I was researching my post above. As mentioned, I'm not home this week. Early next week I'll remove the dial and take better pictures. In the meantime, I do have a few more pictures that might help. All of these pictures were taken on an angle to avoid the glare from the flash. Hope these are of some help. Thanks.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4323.jpg 
Views:	105 
Size:	253.4 KB 
ID:	339343   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4325.jpg 
Views:	118 
Size:	261.1 KB 
ID:	339344   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4364.jpg 
Views:	117 
Size:	459.4 KB 
ID:	339345  

  10. #10

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: JST)

    Quote Originally Posted by JST View Post
    Smike, you posted to the thread as I was researching my post above. As mentioned, I'm not home this week. Early next week I'll remove the dial and take better pictures. In the meantime, I do have a few more pictures that might help. All of these pictures were taken on an angle to avoid the glare from the flash. Hope these are of some help. Thanks.


    i think the brass weights are right/appropriate... even if not original. if you had the rectangular lead ones, they would be visible (based on location of weight cords) and definitely smack into the pendulum... and there's nothing to keep them from spinning. i think the lead ones typically run down the sides of clocks, in channels (willie has huge experience, i'm a newbie... but have multiple similar clocks.)

    btw... i think this is a lovely clock. i would think more about making sure the movement is happy/healthy and running great... you can always find a matched set of brass weights on eBay if you really want them perfectly matched. these recent photos really show how different they are in color/composition. if you polished them, they might look more alike.

    looking forward to more shots...
    i collect antique clocks because i get all that extra time...

  11. #11

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: JST)

    Maybe someone on the list has one of these clocks? The weights I've seen are cast iron and only about 1 1/4" thick (guessing). The narrow rectangular weights would add about 2 1/2" extra space at the pendulum bob. But that case doesn't look like it would have sufficient depth (front to back). Key measurements would be from the centerline of the cord to the side of the case and the obvious front to back in the weight well.
    Curious, Willie X

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Whitby, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    359

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: JST)

    Hello JST,

    If you do a search in Clocks General for "Waterbury #2 pendulum beat scale", a post from 2006 will show up with four photos showing the clock, pendulum, movement and weights. When you get a close look at the clock (dial off), check to see if the weight pulleys at the top of the case have been moved. The rectangular weight pulleys would be further out than cylindrical weight pulleys so that they could slide down close to the outside of the case and not be visible through the door glass. The post also mentions that some of the rectangular weights were grain painted.

    None of the Waterbury regulator #2 pictures (there aren't many) in Google Images show the weights behind the door glass.

    Jim

  13. #13

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: Jim Hartog)

    Thanks everybody for all of your replies. Very helpful. Fear not, I am not running out and buying anything until I'm back home, have removed the dial, carefully inspected everything, and taken more pictures. Jim H., I appreciate you pointing me to that old post. For those interested in reading it, here's the link:

    http://mb.nawcc.org/showthread.php?2...lum+beat+scale

    I was hoping that somebody on the Message Board has a Waterbury Regulator No. 2 and can post the measurements of the case and some pictures.

    I'll be back next week with more pictures, and probably more questions.

    Thanks.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: JST)

    Quote Originally Posted by Willie X View Post
    Most Waterburys with this movement have thin cigar box shaped weights that are hidden in the sides of a wider case. Willie X

    Quote Originally Posted by smike View Post
    i think the brass weights are right/appropriate... even if not original.






    moral of story: listen to willie 8-)
    i collect antique clocks because i get all that extra time...

  15. #15

    Default Re: Waterbury Weights? (By: bruce linde)

    Problem Solved!! Both weight cords were tangled behind the dial (First Picture). That must have happened in transporting it from the auction. Lesson learned: tie down the weight cords before transportation. I’ve included a couple of pictures showing the weights in their proper positions; with the door open and one with the door closed (Pictures 2 & 3). You can’t see them at all when the door is closed. I also included a picture of the inside of one side of the case that shows wear from the weight rubbing against it (Picture 4). The clock has been running ever since I straightened out the cords.

    Thanks to everybody for their comments and help. Much appreciated!!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4432.jpg 
Views:	76 
Size:	325.1 KB 
ID:	340592   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4438.jpg 
Views:	64 
Size:	382.5 KB 
ID:	340593   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4446.jpg 
Views:	77 
Size:	318.7 KB 
ID:	340594   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4423.jpg 
Views:	78 
Size:	444.9 KB 
ID:	340595  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-22-2013, 07:08 PM
  2. Waterbury No. 20 Reg Weights
    By Richard T. in forum Clocks General.
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-04-2007, 10:59 PM
  3. What are the correct weights for a Waterbury Regulator?
    By Chris Radano in forum Clocks General.
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-24-2006, 09:35 AM
  4. Waterbury #20 weights
    By analogtime in forum Clock Repair
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-18-2006, 09:36 AM
  5. Waterbury Weights and Pendulum
    By Angelo in forum Clocks General.
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-28-2006, 01:33 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •