Goal: $300, Received: $115.00 (38%) Contribute Now
Donate whatever you can or Join the 14,000 other NAWCC members for only $80 (plus $10 for hard copy publications). Check it out here.



Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Default Designing basic deadbeat escapement

    Hello

    I'm new to this forum. I'm trying to design a basic 30 tooth deadbeat escapement but i'm having some issues finding consistent and complete information. I'm trying to make a basic cad drawing and was going to follow up making a brass prototype to verify my design. This is coincidentally *not* for a clock or watch but i am using the escapement in a mechanical design intended to advance a perforated tape 4mm per pallet cycle and it needs to have zero (or near zero) cumulative error. I figured a escapement design would be the easiest way of achieving this with near-perfect accuracy. Any information highly appreciated!

    Thanks

    Knas

  2. #2
    Registered user.
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Calif. USA
    Posts
    13,115

    Default Re: Designing basic deadbeat escapement (By: Knas)

    I don't think you'll be to happy using a deadbeat escapement.
    Your advancing requires an exact diameter wheel to advance
    the tape.
    It is better to us pawls that are linear in motion.
    The advance of tape over a wheel depends on the thickness
    of the tape. Tape laying flat and push with a ratcheting
    action is more accurate.
    The deadbeat as you've suggested is simple. The pallets follow
    a circular path for the locking surfaces.
    The pallets need to be a little less than 1/2 the spacing between the
    teeth. In a clock, we usually set them to 40-45%.
    The teeth on the escapement wheel need to have a backwards rake
    to clear both the exit pallet and entrance pallet.
    A ratchet wheel and a pawl to push it is more consistent. In order to
    get a deadbeat to work it has to have a drop for clearance.
    The pawl and ratchet has 0 drop and can be driven from a crank.
    What problem are you having.
    Tinker Dwight

  3. #3

    Default Re: Designing basic deadbeat escapement (By: Tinker Dwight)

    So what i'm trying to do can be seen here; https://vimeo.com/144454867

    It seems to me that this works really well, the main issue i'm having is that the pallets are not designed right so there's an in-between position where the wheel can spin freely which can cause major problems some times. It took me quite some time just to make it work as well as it does thus i was hoping to find a thorough description of how to properly design the escapement bottoms-up.

    The parts are machine cut so the size should be more or less dead on (cut with a cnc-router right now, i might go for plasma or water jet in the future) - but i guess you're right that there could be cumulative errors after a few hundred turns or so? I thought i'd use this design since clocks are generally very exact devices (my dad was a clockmaker). How would the ratchet be more beneficial? Also, as can be seen in the video i'm using the downwards motion of the machine in question in order to advance the tape - this is something i'd like to keep doing, not sure how i would do this with the ratchet?

    Many Thanks!

    Knas

  4. #4
    Registered user.
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Calif. USA
    Posts
    13,115

    Default Re: Designing basic deadbeat escapement (By: Knas)

    You need to make the pallets longer. Not much just enough to make it stop on each
    rock of the anchor.
    You may have issues with the straight escape wheel teeth.
    They need to have a bout a 15-20 degree rake opposite
    the direction of rotation. The amount depends on the amount of over travel.
    I wasn't able to view the video because of the machine I'm on right now.
    I'll look at it later when I have a different machine.
    Tinker Dwight

  5. #5
    Registered user.
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Calif. USA
    Posts
    13,115

    Default Re: Designing basic deadbeat escapement (By: Tinker Dwight)

    I just looked at the video. The pallets are tapered, unlike a clock that has
    impulse faces. I see no reason that it shouldn't otherwise work.
    The locking surfaces need to follow an exact circle of the arbor.
    The exit needs to be 1/2 of a tooth radius larger than the entrance
    for the LOCK surface.
    You may need to make them both slightly smaller radius arc to compensate for
    the width of the teeth tips ( maybe 2-5% smaller ). The anchors arbor needs
    to be mounted such that the average radius of the two lock surfaces
    forms a circle that passes mid way between two of the teeth on the wheel.
    They need to be long enough that as one drops off the other, it lands on a
    lock surface and not missing the end. It only needs to be a small amount
    ( maybe 1/16 inch longer ).
    Tinker Dwight

  6. #6
    Registered User LaBounty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Mitchell, NE
    Posts
    3,406

    Default Re: Designing basic deadbeat escapement (By: Knas)

    Hi Knas-

    Click Here for an article which includes laying out a deadbeat escapement.

    Good luck with it!

Similar Threads

  1. Designing/drawing a deadbeat escapement--conflicting designs
    By devils4ever in forum Clock Construction.
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-07-2015, 01:39 PM
  2. Deadbeat Escapement Design Question
    By cmnewcomer in forum Clock Repair
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-02-2009, 03:12 PM
  3. Help with Deadbeat Escapement
    By Jeremy Woodoff in forum Clock Repair
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-26-2008, 03:44 PM
  4. Half Deadbeat escapement
    By al_taka in forum Clock Repair
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-07-2008, 10:38 PM
  5. Semi-deadbeat escapement
    By Seth Thomas Fan in forum Clocks General.
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-31-2006, 12:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •