Goal: $300, Received: $305.00 (102%) Contribute Now
Donate whatever you can or Join the 14,000 other NAWCC members for only $80 (plus $10 for hard copy publications). Check it out here.



Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Default Some questions about a McGregor chronometer

    Dear all, I am a new member of this forum. My name is Marco and I live in Milan, Italy. I am pretty naive about timepieces in general and marine chronometers in particular, but I would like to learn. Recently I bought a McGregor chronometer from an English dealer. I am puzzled by a few things and would like to get some help from the experts, if possible.

    1st question. The chronometer's number is J/5816. I wasn't unable to discover what the "J" means. Many McGregor's chronometers have an alphabetic prefix. As far as I understand, "K" typically refers to chronometers with Kullberg movements and "M" to Mercer. But "J"? I have been told my chronometer has a Mercer movement. How can I check this? (The movement's number is 5763.)

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DialFront.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	869.5 KB 
ID:	322319

    2nd question. What kind of auxiliary compensation is a "Double Auxiliary"? (see the dial) Looking at the balance wheel, it seems to me a variation on a Poole's auxiliary. May it be an Eiffe's auxiliary?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BalanceWheel.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	114.4 KB 
ID:	322320

    Thank you for your attention.
    Marco

  2. #2
    Technical Admin Tom McIntyre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Boston. MA USA
    Posts
    18,630
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default Re: Some questions about a McGregor chronometer (By: Marco C.)

    I do not really know the McGregor chronometers, but given the meaning of M and K prefixes, I would venture that J is for Johannsen.

    The balance appears to have Poole's auxiliary and Airy's Bar and I suspect that is the meaning of double auxiliary. Perhaps someone more familiar with this terminology will chime in.

    In any case, welcome to the NAWCC Message Board and good luck in your collecting pursuits.
    Tom McIntyre Click me.
    If you don't learn to laugh at trouble,
    you won't have anything to laugh at when you're old.
    Will Rogers

  3. #3

    Default Re: Some questions about a McGregor chronometer (By: Tom McIntyre)

    Thank you Tom, I had a look at Airy's Bar on Gould's book and you are probably right.

    M.

  4. #4
    Technical Admin Tom McIntyre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Boston. MA USA
    Posts
    18,630
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default Re: Some questions about a McGregor chronometer (By: Marco C.)

    I think this chronometer is pictured here in another thread, but this is a pretty good view of Airy's bar.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AirysBar.jpg 
Views:	92 
Size:	122.4 KB 
ID:	322364Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DialSpecial.jpg 
Views:	74 
Size:	633.1 KB 
ID:	322366Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BoxFrontSpecial.jpg 
Views:	73 
Size:	551.5 KB 
ID:	322365
    Tom McIntyre Click me.
    If you don't learn to laugh at trouble,
    you won't have anything to laugh at when you're old.
    Will Rogers

  5. #5

    Default Re: Some questions about a McGregor chronometer (By: Tom McIntyre)

    Thank you again, but I am not sure it's the same type of device. I don't have access to the chronometer right now and I cannot check directly, but here is another picture:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BalanceWheel2.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	194.2 KB 
ID:	322383

    It seems that there is no supplementary bar, and the two internal arms seem to be screwed to the balance rims. If this is the case it's something different (but tomorrow I'll check directly).
    Last edited by Marco C.; 11-13-2016 at 04:43 PM.

  6. #6
    Technical Admin Tom McIntyre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Boston. MA USA
    Posts
    18,630
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default Re: Some questions about a McGregor chronometer (By: Marco C.)

    It does look different. The key point of Airy's bar is that the temperature compensation mid point can be shifted by moving the center bar with respect to the balance center bar. That allows the temperature compensation adjustment to not interfere with poise.

    The center arm on your balance looks very thick as well as the two spring loaded compensation weights being screwed into the arms. Perhaps one of our friends can come up with some documentation on what the theory behind it was.
    Tom McIntyre Click me.
    If you don't learn to laugh at trouble,
    you won't have anything to laugh at when you're old.
    Will Rogers

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    4,880

    Default Re: Some questions about a McGregor chronometer (By: Tom McIntyre)

    The dial number and movement number should match. Your balance has a double auxiliary. The three screws near the arms are the Pooles' auxiliary. This is usually applied to a simple bimetallic rim but yours has an inner steel extra section screwed in at one end and free at the other. That is the second auxiliary.


    Mercer's Book "Chronometer makers of the world "has a long section on McGregor serial numbers but I can not find any specific reference to yours. Many serial numbers in the Kullberg section are close and that auxiliary looks a lot like the kind of thing Kullberg was doing, but Mercers says his double auxiliaries were a combination of Poole and Eiffe's

    To answer your question directly the best information is in Mercer's book. You have a very interesting chronometer despite the dial issue. Yours is not listed as either Mercer or Kullberg. Johannson listing include numbers 5822 and 5823 for the year 1906, so the most likely maker, of the three, is Johannsen.

    I am puzzled by the dial and movement number not matching, it does describe the chronometer. I t may have been that way from when it was made.

    BTW I just looked it up and am not an expert so if a real expert has a different view from mine theirs probably correct.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Some questions about a McGregor chronometer (By: Dr. Jon)

    I'm not an expert either, but I think that the fact the number on the dial is different from the one on the movement is not a problem. I saw the same thing in other pieces. I think that 5763 is the number assigned by the maker of the movement (whoever he is), while J/5816 is the number assigned by McGregor to the whole piece. Looking at the balance more carefully it seems to me that it could indeed be a combination of Poole and Eiffe's.

Similar Threads

  1. Some Questions about a Cleveland Ohio Neon Vintage Clock
    By clocks in forum Electric Horology
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-20-2012, 10:58 PM
  2. Some questions about this omega
    By jcmjr in forum European & Other Pocket Watches
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-15-2011, 04:31 AM
  3. Some questions about the Traffic Specials
    By Tref in forum American Pocket Watches
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-02-2010, 09:08 PM
  4. American Pocket Watch Some questions about a Waltham ladies pocket watch
    By John Midgley in forum Watch Repair
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-08-2006, 11:34 PM
  5. Hello-some questions about this pocket watch...
    By Blodge in forum American Pocket Watches
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-29-2005, 10:46 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •